Tenants' Dilemma- On Collective Action in Housing
Bo Bengtsson
Abstract
Bo Bengtsson
Abstract
This paper discusses tenant participation in a rational choice perspective, where collective action will neither be initiated, nor maintained, unless found profitable in one way or another by every single individual taking part. This ' n -person prisoners' dilemma' indicates that not the failures but the successful cases of tenant participation call for an explanation. It is claimed that a better understanding of collective action in housing may be developed only if the general and specific conditions of the local housing arena are considered. This includes the following assertions: (1) different tenants may have different motives for taking part in collective action; (2) the dynamics of the relations between tenants must be considered when analysing the conditions of initiating and retaining co-operation; (3) there are different types of collective action in housing, including collective consumption, collective work and collective decision-making; (4) the physical and social conditions of specific housing estates can be more or less favourable to co-operation; (5) tenure forms often define the institutional conditions of collective action in housing.
OpenAlex reports 58 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper discusses tenant participation in a rational choice perspective, where collective action will neither be initiated, nor maintained, unless found profitable in one way or another by every single individual taking part. This ' n -person prisoners' dilemma' indicates that not the failures but the successful cases of tenant participation call for an explanation. It is claimed that a better understanding of collective action in housing may be developed only if the general and specific conditions of the local housing arena are considered. This includes the following assertions: (1) different tenants may have different motives for taking part in collective action; (2) the dynamics of the relations between tenants must be considered when analysing the conditions of initiating and retaining co-operation; (3) there are different types of collective action in housing, including collective consumption, collective work and collective decision-making; (4) the physical and social conditions of specific housing estates can be more or less favourable to co-operation; (5) tenure forms often define the institutional conditions of collective action in housing.
Key concepts: Collective action, Dilemma, Action (physics), Perspective (graphical), Work (physics), Social dilemma, Law and economics, Microeconomics