2009IEEE Vehicular Technology MagazineRequires access

Positive train control in North America

Ronald Lindsey

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Railroads are safe, and this safety is due to the traffic control and communication technologies that were introduced in the first half of the 20th century. Modern versions of these traditional technologies continue to provide safe and sound train movement by ensuring the integrity of the generation and delivery of the authorities provided to train crews to advance down the track. With that stated, however, accidents do occur in that very few of these technologies protect against actions of the last remaining major source of operational errors made by the train crews themselves. The technologies that have been available for such protection have been either too expensive or not available for other than selective mixed freight/passenger corridors, e.g., the Northeast Corridor. However, based on advanced positioning and communication technologies, a new surge in both traffic management approaches for productivity purposes as well as train control for safety purposes, referred to as positive train control (PTC), have been underway for two decades in anticipation of the implementation across freight operations. The material presented henceforth provides a basic understanding of rail operations followed by a discussion on the workings and considerations of deploying PTC, as evidenced by the development of CSX's PTC effort referred to as communication-based train management (CBTM). Railroadese used in this article is shown in italics.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Railroads are safe, and this safety is due to the traffic control and communication technologies that were introduced in the first half of the 20th century. Modern versions of these traditional technologies continue to provide safe and sound train movement by ensuring the integrity of the generation and delivery of the authorities provided to train crews to advance down the track. With that stated, however, accidents do occur in that very few of these technologies protect against actions of the last remaining major source of operational errors made by the train crews themselves. The technologies that have been available for such protection have been either too expensive or not available for other than selective mixed freight/passenger corridors, e.g., the Northeast Corridor. However, based on advanced positioning and communication technologies, a new surge in both traffic management approaches for productivity purposes as well as train control for safety purposes, referred to as positive train control (PTC), have been underway for two decades in anticipation of the implementation across freight operations. The material presented henceforth provides a basic understanding of rail operations followed by a discussion on the workings and considerations of deploying PTC, as evidenced by the development of CSX's PTC effort referred to as communication-based train management (CBTM). Railroadese used in this article is shown in italics.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Railroads are safe, and this safety is due to the traffic control and communication technologies that were introduced in the first half of the 20th century. Modern versions of these traditional technologies continue to provide safe and sound train movement by ensuring the integrity of the generation and delivery of the authorities provided to train crews to advance down the track. With that stated, however, accidents do occur in that very few of these technologies protect against actions of the last remaining major source of operational errors made by the train crews themselves. The technologies that have been available for such protection have been either too expensive or not available for other than selective mixed freight/passenger corridors, e.g., the Northeast Corridor. However, based on advanced positioning and communication technologies, a new surge in both traffic management approaches for productivity purposes as well as train control for safety purposes, referred to as positive train control (PTC), have been underway for two decades in anticipation of the implementation across freight operations. The material presented henceforth provides a basic understanding of rail operations followed by a discussion on the workings and considerations of deploying PTC, as evidenced by the development of CSX's PTC effort referred to as communication-based train management (CBTM). Railroadese used in this article is shown in italics.

Key concepts: Anticipation (artificial intelligence), Train, Emerging technologies, Control (management), Track (disk drive), Transport engineering, Engineering, Telecommunications

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Positive train control in North America — Research Paper | ScholarLens