ScholarLens Back to search
1976•Social Behavior and Personality An International JournalOpen access

THE SHIFT TO COMPETITION IN THE PRISONER'S DILEMMA GAME

Ayala Malach Pines

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

The relative power of cooperative and trusting patterns of behavior versus those of exploitation and distrust in affecting the results of group decision-making processes was investigated. The outcome of a study using the Prisoner's Dilemma Game seems to suggest the disproportionate influence of competitive people in these settings. When groups consisting of cooperative and competitive players were asked to reach a unanimous decision about game strategy, in the majority of cases their decision was not to cooperate. This is a rather disturbing finding in light of the prevalence and importance of group decisions in everyday life. Three additional studies were carried out in an attempt to explore some alternative explanations of this shift to competition. The combined outcome of the three studies suggests that the shift to competition is reflecting both a group effect and a player effect.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The relative power of cooperative and trusting patterns of behavior versus those of exploitation and distrust in affecting the results of group decision-making processes was investigated. The outcome of a study using the Prisoner's Dilemma Game seems to suggest the disproportionate influence of competitive people in these settings. When groups consisting of cooperative and competitive players were asked to reach a unanimous decision about game strategy, in the majority of cases their decision was not to cooperate. This is a rather disturbing finding in light of the prevalence and importance of group decisions in everyday life. Three additional studies were carried out in an attempt to explore some alternative explanations of this shift to competition. The combined outcome of the three studies suggests that the shift to competition is reflecting both a group effect and a player effect.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The relative power of cooperative and trusting patterns of behavior versus those of exploitation and distrust in affecting the results of group decision-making processes was investigated. The outcome of a study using the Prisoner's Dilemma Game seems to suggest the disproportionate influence of competitive people in these settings. When groups consisting of cooperative and competitive players were asked to reach a unanimous decision about game strategy, in the majority of cases their decision was not to cooperate. This is a rather disturbing finding in light of the prevalence and importance of group decisions in everyday life. Three additional studies were carried out in an attempt to explore some alternative explanations of this shift to competition. The combined outcome of the three studies suggests that the shift to competition is reflecting both a group effect and a player effect.

Key concepts: Distrust, Dilemma, Outcome (game theory), Psychology, Competition (biology), Prisoner's dilemma, Social psychology, Power (physics)

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
THE SHIFT TO COMPETITION IN THE PRISONER'S DILEMMA GAME — Research Paper | ScholarLens