1965Poultry ScienceOpen access

A Comparison of Various Varieties of Sorghum as Substitute for Corn in Practical Chick Diets

A.R. Kemmerer, Burt W. Heywang

Open full text 10 citations

Abstract

SORGHUM grains have generally been assumed to be approximately equal to corn in nutritive value and could be equally substituted for corn. In animal diets, however, some recent experiments have shown that sorghum grains are not of equal nutritional value to corn, and that the nutritional values of the different varieties of sorghum grains varied among themselves. Adrian (1958) reported that all African cereals, including grain sorghum, were lysine deficient, and that sorghum grain had a protein digestibility 90% that of corn. Pond et al. (1958) found that protein of sorghum grains was inadequate in lysine and threonine. Vavich et al. (1959) reported that for the growing chick sorghum grains were limited in lysine and that sorghum grains containing high amounts of protein were more limited in this amino acid than sorghum grains containing relatively low amounts of protein. On the other hand, Ozment et al. (1963) reported that corn…

About this research paper

What this paper is about

SORGHUM grains have generally been assumed to be approximately equal to corn in nutritive value and could be equally substituted for corn. In animal diets, however, some recent experiments have shown that sorghum grains are not of equal nutritional value to corn, and that the nutritional values of the different varieties of sorghum grains varied among themselves. Adrian (1958) reported that all African cereals, including grain sorghum, were lysine deficient, and that sorghum grain had a protein digestibility 90% that of corn. Pond et al. (1958) found that protein of sorghum grains was inadequate in lysine and threonine. Vavich et al. (1959) reported that for the growing chick sorghum grains were limited in lysine and that sorghum grains containing high amounts of protein were more limited in this amino acid than sorghum grains containing relatively low amounts of protein. On the other hand, Ozment et al. (1963) reported that corn…

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

SORGHUM grains have generally been assumed to be approximately equal to corn in nutritive value and could be equally substituted for corn. In animal diets, however, some recent experiments have shown that sorghum grains are not of equal nutritional value to corn, and that the nutritional values of the different varieties of sorghum grains varied among themselves. Adrian (1958) reported that all African cereals, including grain sorghum, were lysine deficient, and that sorghum grain had a protein digestibility 90% that of corn. Pond et al. (1958) found that protein of sorghum grains was inadequate in lysine and threonine. Vavich et al. (1959) reported that for the growing chick sorghum grains were limited in lysine and that sorghum grains containing high amounts of protein were more limited in this amino acid than sorghum grains containing relatively low amounts of protein. On the other hand, Ozment et al. (1963) reported that corn…

Key concepts: Sorghum, Agronomy, Lysine, Biological value, Food science, Sorghum bicolor, Biology, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparison of Various Varieties of Sorghum as Substitute for Corn in Practical Chick Diets — Research Paper | ScholarLens