Distinguishing between Betula pendula Roth. and Betula pubescens Ehrh. on the basis of wood anatomy.
K. Gopalakrishna Bhat, Matti Kärkkäinen
Abstract
Open-access reader
K. Gopalakrishna Bhat, Matti Kärkkäinen
Abstract
Open-access reader
It was concluded on the basis of the anatomical investigations of four mature trees that Roth can be distinguished from Ehrh. using the number of bars per scalariform perforation plate as an identification factor. If the average number of bars is more than 17.6, the sample is probably from , and if less, from The accuracy can be slightly improved by using the vessel frequency as another factor.Betula pendula B. pubescensB. pubescensB. pendula.
OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
It was concluded on the basis of the anatomical investigations of four mature trees that Roth can be distinguished from Ehrh. using the number of bars per scalariform perforation plate as an identification factor. If the average number of bars is more than 17.6, the sample is probably from , and if less, from The accuracy can be slightly improved by using the vessel frequency as another factor.Betula pendula B. pubescensB. pubescensB. pendula.
Key concepts: Betula pendula, Betula pubescens, Botany, Betulaceae, Biology