2011•African and Black Diaspora An International JournalRequires access

Comparison and connection in the study of Afro-Latin America

Mark D. Anderson

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This essay examines the relationship between comparison – as a scholarly method and social practice – and the study of transnationalism and diaspora. Attention to transnational and diasporic processes forces us to critically reassess comparison as a scholarly method. However, rather than abandon comparison, scholars interested in transnationalism and diaspora need to recognize the centrality of comparison to transnational encounters and diasporic identity formations. Drawing on the case of the transnational world of the Garifuna between the United States and Honduras, the essay highlights the importance of comparing Garifuna identity formations in both locations in order to understand their multiple relationships to the African (or black) diaspora, and the importance of their own practices of comparison in helping to produce diasporic identities. Paying attention to how social agents make comparisons within specific contexts can provide a fruitful path of inquiry for studies of transnationalism and diaspora.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This essay examines the relationship between comparison – as a scholarly method and social practice – and the study of transnationalism and diaspora. Attention to transnational and diasporic processes forces us to critically reassess comparison as a scholarly method. However, rather than abandon comparison, scholars interested in transnationalism and diaspora need to recognize the centrality of comparison to transnational encounters and diasporic identity formations. Drawing on the case of the transnational world of the Garifuna between the United States and Honduras, the essay highlights the importance of comparing Garifuna identity formations in both locations in order to understand their multiple relationships to the African (or black) diaspora, and the importance of their own practices of comparison in helping to produce diasporic identities. Paying attention to how social agents make comparisons within specific contexts can provide a fruitful path of inquiry for studies of transnationalism and diaspora.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This essay examines the relationship between comparison – as a scholarly method and social practice – and the study of transnationalism and diaspora. Attention to transnational and diasporic processes forces us to critically reassess comparison as a scholarly method. However, rather than abandon comparison, scholars interested in transnationalism and diaspora need to recognize the centrality of comparison to transnational encounters and diasporic identity formations. Drawing on the case of the transnational world of the Garifuna between the United States and Honduras, the essay highlights the importance of comparing Garifuna identity formations in both locations in order to understand their multiple relationships to the African (or black) diaspora, and the importance of their own practices of comparison in helping to produce diasporic identities. Paying attention to how social agents make comparisons within specific contexts can provide a fruitful path of inquiry for studies of transnationalism and diaspora.

Key concepts: Diaspora, Transnationalism, Centrality, Identity (music), Latin Americans, Sociology, Gender studies, Anthropology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison and connection in the study of Afro-Latin America — Research Paper | ScholarLens