1991American Journal of AudiologyRequires access

Auditory Event-Related Potentials Elicited From Cochlear Implant Recipients and Hearing Subjects

Dana L. Oviatt, Paul R. Kileny

Open publisher page 42 citations

Abstract

Auditory event-related evoked potentials (ERP) were recorded from 10 cochlear implant recipients and 10 age-matched hearing subjects using an oddball paradigm in which frequently occurring tone bursts of 500 Hz were interspersed within rarely occurring tone bursts of 1000, 2000, or 3000 Hz. Signals were delivered acoustically to both groups of subjects through a loudspeaker. P-300 peak latencies for the implant recipients were significantly longer than those for the hearing subjects for the 500-1000 and 500-2000 Hz frequency contrast conditions, but not for the 500-3000 Hz contrast condition. For the hearing subjects, P3 latency did not change significantly across the three frequency contrast conditions; however, for the implant recipients, P3 latencies were significantly longer for the 500-1000 Hz signal contrasts than for 500-2000 and 500-3000 Hz signal contrasts. These results suggest that although implant recipients had more difficulty than hearing subjects in discriminating the 500-1000 and 500-2000 Hz contrasts, the implant recipients and hearing subjects discriminated the widest 500-3000 Hz frequency contrast equally well. The ERP appears to be a reliable index of signal detection and discrimination in cochlear implant recipients and consequently may be useful for device programming and for monitoring the progress of these individuals.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Auditory event-related evoked potentials (ERP) were recorded from 10 cochlear implant recipients and 10 age-matched hearing subjects using an oddball paradigm in which frequently occurring tone bursts of 500 Hz were interspersed within rarely occurring tone bursts of 1000, 2000, or 3000 Hz. Signals were delivered acoustically to both groups of subjects through a loudspeaker. P-300 peak latencies for the implant recipients were significantly longer than those for the hearing subjects for the 500-1000 and 500-2000 Hz frequency contrast conditions, but not for the 500-3000 Hz contrast condition. For the hearing subjects, P3 latency did not change significantly across the three frequency contrast conditions; however, for the implant recipients, P3 latencies were significantly longer for the 500-1000 Hz signal contrasts than for 500-2000 and 500-3000 Hz signal contrasts. These results suggest that although implant recipients had more difficulty than hearing subjects in discriminating the 500-1000 and 500-2000 Hz contrasts, the implant recipients and hearing subjects discriminated the widest 500-3000 Hz frequency contrast equally well. The ERP appears to be a reliable index of signal detection and discrimination in cochlear implant recipients and consequently may be useful for device programming and for monitoring the progress of these individuals.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 42 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Auditory event-related evoked potentials (ERP) were recorded from 10 cochlear implant recipients and 10 age-matched hearing subjects using an oddball paradigm in which frequently occurring tone bursts of 500 Hz were interspersed within rarely occurring tone bursts of 1000, 2000, or 3000 Hz. Signals were delivered acoustically to both groups of subjects through a loudspeaker. P-300 peak latencies for the implant recipients were significantly longer than those for the hearing subjects for the 500-1000 and 500-2000 Hz frequency contrast conditions, but not for the 500-3000 Hz contrast condition. For the hearing subjects, P3 latency did not change significantly across the three frequency contrast conditions; however, for the implant recipients, P3 latencies were significantly longer for the 500-1000 Hz signal contrasts than for 500-2000 and 500-3000 Hz signal contrasts. These results suggest that although implant recipients had more difficulty than hearing subjects in discriminating the 500-1000 and 500-2000 Hz contrasts, the implant recipients and hearing subjects discriminated the widest 500-3000 Hz frequency contrast equally well. The ERP appears to be a reliable index of signal detection and discrimination in cochlear implant recipients and consequently may be useful for device programming and for monitoring the progress of these individuals.

Key concepts: Audiology, Cochlear implant, Implant, Contrast (vision), Medicine, Oddball paradigm, Pure tone, Tone (literature)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Auditory Event-Related Potentials Elicited From Cochlear Implant Recipients and Hearing Subjects — Research Paper | ScholarLens