2004•Canadian Journal of School PsychologyRequires access

Resistance: Experienced and Novice Consultants' Interpretations and Strategies for Addressing it in Behavioral Consultation Interviews

Todd C. Gorges, Stephen Nelson Elliott, Ryan J. Kettler

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

This study examined whether experienced and novice school psychology consultants differed in identification of consultee resistance, attribution of sources of resistance, and quantity and variety of strategies to handle resistance. The participants were characterized as novice consultants (N = 33) if they had completed fewer than 20 cases or as experienced consultants (N = 19) if they had completed 20 or more cases. All participants viewed two videotapes of consultation cases: one featuring overt resistance and one featuring subtle resistance. Participants completed involvement worksheets, indicating when they observed resistance on the videotape, who was the source of the resistance, and what strategies could be used to address the resistance and the rationales behind such strategies. The findings supported the prediction that all participants would attribute resistance primarily to the consultee rather than to the psychologist or the environment. The prediction that experienced consultants would produce a greater number and variety of strategies also was supported, but only for the overt-resistance case. The findings did not support the prediction that experienced consultants would identify more resistant statements/behaviors than novice consultants. These results indicate the need for further research on attributions to resistance in behavioral consultation, and the use of more extensive strategies to address resistance by experienced school psychology consultants.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study examined whether experienced and novice school psychology consultants differed in identification of consultee resistance, attribution of sources of resistance, and quantity and variety of strategies to handle resistance. The participants were characterized as novice consultants (N = 33) if they had completed fewer than 20 cases or as experienced consultants (N = 19) if they had completed 20 or more cases. All participants viewed two videotapes of consultation cases: one featuring overt resistance and one featuring subtle resistance. Participants completed involvement worksheets, indicating when they observed resistance on the videotape, who was the source of the resistance, and what strategies could be used to address the resistance and the rationales behind such strategies. The findings supported the prediction that all participants would attribute resistance primarily to the consultee rather than to the psychologist or the environment. The prediction that experienced consultants would produce a greater number and variety of strategies also was supported, but only for the overt-resistance case. The findings did not support the prediction that experienced consultants would identify more resistant statements/behaviors than novice consultants. These results indicate the need for further research on attributions to resistance in behavioral consultation, and the use of more extensive strategies to address resistance by experienced school psychology consultants.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study examined whether experienced and novice school psychology consultants differed in identification of consultee resistance, attribution of sources of resistance, and quantity and variety of strategies to handle resistance. The participants were characterized as novice consultants (N = 33) if they had completed fewer than 20 cases or as experienced consultants (N = 19) if they had completed 20 or more cases. All participants viewed two videotapes of consultation cases: one featuring overt resistance and one featuring subtle resistance. Participants completed involvement worksheets, indicating when they observed resistance on the videotape, who was the source of the resistance, and what strategies could be used to address the resistance and the rationales behind such strategies. The findings supported the prediction that all participants would attribute resistance primarily to the consultee rather than to the psychologist or the environment. The prediction that experienced consultants would produce a greater number and variety of strategies also was supported, but only for the overt-resistance case. The findings did not support the prediction that experienced consultants would identify more resistant statements/behaviors than novice consultants. These results indicate the need for further research on attributions to resistance in behavioral consultation, and the use of more extensive strategies to address resistance by experienced school psychology consultants.

Key concepts: Resistance (ecology), Attribution, Psychology, Variety (cybernetics), Identification (biology), Applied psychology, Clinical psychology, Medical education

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Resistance: Experienced and Novice Consultants' Interpretations and Strategies for Addressing it in Behavioral Consultation Interviews — Research Paper | ScholarLens