1999Cambridge Review of International AffairsRequires access

A defence of liberal democracy for Africa

Fernando R. Tesón

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

The article counters criticism of liberal democracy in Africa, and proposes that liberal democracy is the best way to address Africa's political and economic problems. It contends that recent democratisation efforts have failed due to the conceptual confusion between majoritarianism and constitutional democracy, where only the latter can ensure freedom and security on the continent. The article goes on to argue for the primacy of individual rights over collective or group rights as the latter increase government control over people's lives. Despotic leaders often misuse group rights and repress the groups that empowered them. Finally, the article rejects as empirically and morally false the view that economic development should be a precondition for democratisation, and that African culture is in some way inimical to liberal democracy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The article counters criticism of liberal democracy in Africa, and proposes that liberal democracy is the best way to address Africa's political and economic problems. It contends that recent democratisation efforts have failed due to the conceptual confusion between majoritarianism and constitutional democracy, where only the latter can ensure freedom and security on the continent. The article goes on to argue for the primacy of individual rights over collective or group rights as the latter increase government control over people's lives. Despotic leaders often misuse group rights and repress the groups that empowered them. Finally, the article rejects as empirically and morally false the view that economic development should be a precondition for democratisation, and that African culture is in some way inimical to liberal democracy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The article counters criticism of liberal democracy in Africa, and proposes that liberal democracy is the best way to address Africa's political and economic problems. It contends that recent democratisation efforts have failed due to the conceptual confusion between majoritarianism and constitutional democracy, where only the latter can ensure freedom and security on the continent. The article goes on to argue for the primacy of individual rights over collective or group rights as the latter increase government control over people's lives. Despotic leaders often misuse group rights and repress the groups that empowered them. Finally, the article rejects as empirically and morally false the view that economic development should be a precondition for democratisation, and that African culture is in some way inimical to liberal democracy.

Key concepts: Democracy, Democratization, Liberal democracy, Criticism, Political science, Politics, Political economy, Law and economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A defence of liberal democracy for Africa — Research Paper | ScholarLens