1994Journal Of Clinical PeriodontologyRequires access

Bleeding on probing. A parameter for monitoring periodontal conditions in clinical practice

Andreas Joss, Rolf Adler, Niklaus P. Lang

Open publisher page 263 citations

Abstract

The present study is a follow-up report on the use of bleeding on probing (BOP) as a clinical indicator for disease progression or periodontal stability, respectively. Following active periodontal therapy, 39 patients were incorporated in a program of supportive periodontal therapy for a period of 53 months with recall intervals varying between 2-8 months. The patients received supportive therapy 7 to 14 x. At the beginning of each maintenance visit, the tissues were evaluated using BOP. Reinstrumentation was only performed at sites which bled on probing. However, supragingival plaque and calculus were always removed. Probing depth and probing attachment levels were determined after active treatment and at the conclusion of the study. Progression of periodontal disease was defined by a measured loss of probing attachment of 2 mm or more. During the observation period, 4.2% of all the sites lost attachment. Approximately 50% of these losses were due to periodontal disease progression, while the other half was the result of attachment loss in conjunction with recession of the gingiva. 2/3 of all the sites which lost attachment were found in a group of patients which presented a mean BOP > or = 30%. In a group of patients with a mean BOP of < or = 20%, only 1/5 of the loser sites were found. This clearly indicated, that patients with a mean BOP of < or = 20% have a significantly lower risk for further loss of probing attachment at single sites.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The present study is a follow-up report on the use of bleeding on probing (BOP) as a clinical indicator for disease progression or periodontal stability, respectively. Following active periodontal therapy, 39 patients were incorporated in a program of supportive periodontal therapy for a period of 53 months with recall intervals varying between 2-8 months. The patients received supportive therapy 7 to 14 x. At the beginning of each maintenance visit, the tissues were evaluated using BOP. Reinstrumentation was only performed at sites which bled on probing. However, supragingival plaque and calculus were always removed. Probing depth and probing attachment levels were determined after active treatment and at the conclusion of the study. Progression of periodontal disease was defined by a measured loss of probing attachment of 2 mm or more. During the observation period, 4.2% of all the sites lost attachment. Approximately 50% of these losses were due to periodontal disease progression, while the other half was the result of attachment loss in conjunction with recession of the gingiva. 2/3 of all the sites which lost attachment were found in a group of patients which presented a mean BOP > or = 30%. In a group of patients with a mean BOP of < or = 20%, only 1/5 of the loser sites were found. This clearly indicated, that patients with a mean BOP of < or = 20% have a significantly lower risk for further loss of probing attachment at single sites.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 263 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The present study is a follow-up report on the use of bleeding on probing (BOP) as a clinical indicator for disease progression or periodontal stability, respectively. Following active periodontal therapy, 39 patients were incorporated in a program of supportive periodontal therapy for a period of 53 months with recall intervals varying between 2-8 months. The patients received supportive therapy 7 to 14 x. At the beginning of each maintenance visit, the tissues were evaluated using BOP. Reinstrumentation was only performed at sites which bled on probing. However, supragingival plaque and calculus were always removed. Probing depth and probing attachment levels were determined after active treatment and at the conclusion of the study. Progression of periodontal disease was defined by a measured loss of probing attachment of 2 mm or more. During the observation period, 4.2% of all the sites lost attachment. Approximately 50% of these losses were due to periodontal disease progression, while the other half was the result of attachment loss in conjunction with recession of the gingiva. 2/3 of all the sites which lost attachment were found in a group of patients which presented a mean BOP > or = 30%. In a group of patients with a mean BOP of < or = 20%, only 1/5 of the loser sites were found. This clearly indicated, that patients with a mean BOP of < or = 20% have a significantly lower risk for further loss of probing attachment at single sites.

Key concepts: Medicine, Dentistry, Clinical Practice, Periodontitis, Periodontal disease, Intensive care medicine, Physical therapy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bleeding on probing. A parameter for monitoring periodontal conditions in clinical practice — Research Paper | ScholarLens