1982RadiologyRequires access

Conventional metrizamide myelography (MM) and computed tomographic metrizamide myelography (CTMM) in scoliosis. A comparative study.

H. Pettersson, Derek C. Harwood-Nash, C R Fitz, H S Chuang, Edward A. Armstrong

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

A retrospective examination was performed to assess the accuracy of metrizamide myelography (MM) and computed tomographic metrizamide myelography (CTMM) in scoliosis. Of 81 consecutive scoliotic children studied by myelography, 30 had only MM while the remaining 51 had CTMM immediately afterward. CTMM added essential diagnostic information in 13 cases of dysraphism and 4 cases of idiopathic scoliosis; in the remaining cases, both methods gave the same information. The authors conclude that in patients with severe scoliosis, dysraphism, and scoliosis with localized neurological disturbances, CTMM should always be added to MM or be the only examination; while in idiopathic scoliosis with vague neurological disturbances a survey of the entire spine is essential, preferably with MM.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A retrospective examination was performed to assess the accuracy of metrizamide myelography (MM) and computed tomographic metrizamide myelography (CTMM) in scoliosis. Of 81 consecutive scoliotic children studied by myelography, 30 had only MM while the remaining 51 had CTMM immediately afterward. CTMM added essential diagnostic information in 13 cases of dysraphism and 4 cases of idiopathic scoliosis; in the remaining cases, both methods gave the same information. The authors conclude that in patients with severe scoliosis, dysraphism, and scoliosis with localized neurological disturbances, CTMM should always be added to MM or be the only examination; while in idiopathic scoliosis with vague neurological disturbances a survey of the entire spine is essential, preferably with MM.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A retrospective examination was performed to assess the accuracy of metrizamide myelography (MM) and computed tomographic metrizamide myelography (CTMM) in scoliosis. Of 81 consecutive scoliotic children studied by myelography, 30 had only MM while the remaining 51 had CTMM immediately afterward. CTMM added essential diagnostic information in 13 cases of dysraphism and 4 cases of idiopathic scoliosis; in the remaining cases, both methods gave the same information. The authors conclude that in patients with severe scoliosis, dysraphism, and scoliosis with localized neurological disturbances, CTMM should always be added to MM or be the only examination; while in idiopathic scoliosis with vague neurological disturbances a survey of the entire spine is essential, preferably with MM.

Key concepts: Metrizamide, Myelography, Medicine, Scoliosis, Computed tomographic, Radiology, Nuclear medicine, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Conventional metrizamide myelography (MM) and computed tomographic metrizamide myelography (CTMM) in scoliosis. A comparative study. — Research Paper | ScholarLens