2006Journal of ASTM InternationalRequires access

Tweaking the System: Modifications to the Superpave Mix Design System

RS McDaniel, K A Hansen, DE Newcomb, DS Decker

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract A recent survey by the Association of Modified Asphalt Producers showed that a majority of states now use some form of PG+ specifications, meaning that they have added tests or requirements to the Performance Graded (PG) binder specification. The situation for the Superpave mix design system is analogous. States have added requirements, changed various parameters, and implemented or declined to implement revisions to the AASHTO specifications. In 2004 and 2005, the National Asphalt Pavement Association and Federal Highway Administration sponsored a series of regional workshops across the country to assess the current state of the practice with Superpave and hot mix asphalt in general. Four workshops were held in conjunction with the regional asphalt user producer group meetings. At these workshops, industry and agency personnel shared their experiences with Superpave. One key objective of the workshops was to determine what changes had been made to the mix design system and the rationale for those changes. This paper summarizes the changes that have been made to the system across the country, giving a snapshot of the current state of the practice.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract A recent survey by the Association of Modified Asphalt Producers showed that a majority of states now use some form of PG+ specifications, meaning that they have added tests or requirements to the Performance Graded (PG) binder specification. The situation for the Superpave mix design system is analogous. States have added requirements, changed various parameters, and implemented or declined to implement revisions to the AASHTO specifications. In 2004 and 2005, the National Asphalt Pavement Association and Federal Highway Administration sponsored a series of regional workshops across the country to assess the current state of the practice with Superpave and hot mix asphalt in general. Four workshops were held in conjunction with the regional asphalt user producer group meetings. At these workshops, industry and agency personnel shared their experiences with Superpave. One key objective of the workshops was to determine what changes had been made to the mix design system and the rationale for those changes. This paper summarizes the changes that have been made to the system across the country, giving a snapshot of the current state of the practice.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract A recent survey by the Association of Modified Asphalt Producers showed that a majority of states now use some form of PG+ specifications, meaning that they have added tests or requirements to the Performance Graded (PG) binder specification. The situation for the Superpave mix design system is analogous. States have added requirements, changed various parameters, and implemented or declined to implement revisions to the AASHTO specifications. In 2004 and 2005, the National Asphalt Pavement Association and Federal Highway Administration sponsored a series of regional workshops across the country to assess the current state of the practice with Superpave and hot mix asphalt in general. Four workshops were held in conjunction with the regional asphalt user producer group meetings. At these workshops, industry and agency personnel shared their experiences with Superpave. One key objective of the workshops was to determine what changes had been made to the mix design system and the rationale for those changes. This paper summarizes the changes that have been made to the system across the country, giving a snapshot of the current state of the practice.

Key concepts: Tweaking, Materials science, Engineering, Electrical engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Tweaking the System: Modifications to the Superpave Mix Design System — Research Paper | ScholarLens