2009Unpublished venueOpen access

Cloud-type dependencies of MODIS and AMSR-E liquid water path differences

Manuel de la Torre Juárez, Brian H. Kahn, Eric J. Fetzer

Open full text 7 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Comparisons of cloud liquid water path (LWP) retrievals are presented from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) located aboard the Aqua spacecraft. LWP differences as a function of cloud top height, cloud fraction, cloud top temperature, LWP, cloud effective radius and cloud optical thickness are quantified in most geophysical conditions. The assumption of vertically homogeneous distributions of cloud water content in the MODIS LWP retrieval yields a slightly poorer agreement than the assumption of stratified cloud liquid water. Furthermore, for a fixed cloud top pressure, the cloud top temperature can lead to sign changes in the LWP difference. In general, AMSR-E LWP is larger than MODIS for small cloud fractions, low values of LWP, and warmer cloud top temperatures. On the other hand, clouds with optical thicknesses above 20 lead to larger MODIS LWP. Using cloud optical thickness as a proxy for cloud type, deep convective clouds and stratus are shown to have the poorest agreement between AMSR-E and MODIS LWP. Particularly large differences are also found at latitudes poleward of 50°. The results of this work help characterize the scene- and cloud-dependent performance of microwave and visible/near infrared retrievals of LWP.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract. Comparisons of cloud liquid water path (LWP) retrievals are presented from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) located aboard the Aqua spacecraft. LWP differences as a function of cloud top height, cloud fraction, cloud top temperature, LWP, cloud effective radius and cloud optical thickness are quantified in most geophysical conditions. The assumption of vertically homogeneous distributions of cloud water content in the MODIS LWP retrieval yields a slightly poorer agreement than the assumption of stratified cloud liquid water. Furthermore, for a fixed cloud top pressure, the cloud top temperature can lead to sign changes in the LWP difference. In general, AMSR-E LWP is larger than MODIS for small cloud fractions, low values of LWP, and warmer cloud top temperatures. On the other hand, clouds with optical thicknesses above 20 lead to larger MODIS LWP. Using cloud optical thickness as a proxy for cloud type, deep convective clouds and stratus are shown to have the poorest agreement between AMSR-E and MODIS LWP. Particularly large differences are also found at latitudes poleward of 50°. The results of this work help characterize the scene- and cloud-dependent performance of microwave and visible/near infrared retrievals of LWP.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract. Comparisons of cloud liquid water path (LWP) retrievals are presented from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E) located aboard the Aqua spacecraft. LWP differences as a function of cloud top height, cloud fraction, cloud top temperature, LWP, cloud effective radius and cloud optical thickness are quantified in most geophysical conditions. The assumption of vertically homogeneous distributions of cloud water content in the MODIS LWP retrieval yields a slightly poorer agreement than the assumption of stratified cloud liquid water. Furthermore, for a fixed cloud top pressure, the cloud top temperature can lead to sign changes in the LWP difference. In general, AMSR-E LWP is larger than MODIS for small cloud fractions, low values of LWP, and warmer cloud top temperatures. On the other hand, clouds with optical thicknesses above 20 lead to larger MODIS LWP. Using cloud optical thickness as a proxy for cloud type, deep convective clouds and stratus are shown to have the poorest agreement between AMSR-E and MODIS LWP. Particularly large differences are also found at latitudes poleward of 50°. The results of this work help characterize the scene- and cloud-dependent performance of microwave and visible/near infrared retrievals of LWP.

Key concepts: Liquid water path, Effective radius, Cloud top, Liquid water content, Moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer, Environmental science, Cloud fraction, Cloud computing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cloud-type dependencies of MODIS and AMSR-E liquid water path differences — Research Paper | ScholarLens