Recovery of Biceps Function after Delayed Repair for Brachial Plexus Injury
P. M. Richardson
Abstract
P. M. Richardson
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In many cases of severe closed injury involving the upper trunk of the brachial plexus, the proximal stump is too damaged to permit direct repair. Under these circumstances, several alternative sources of neurotization have been described, three of which are analyzed here. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirteen patients with brachial plexus injury had paralysis of elbow flexion owing to damage of either the upper trunk or the lateral cord. In four patients, the musculocutaneous nerve was reinnervated through cross-union with the thoracodorsal nerve; all regained strong elbow flexion. One of three the patients with cross-union between the lateral or medial pectoral nerve regained useful elbow flexion. Of six patients with nerve grafting between spinal accessory and musculocutaneous nerves, four regained useful elbow flexion. CONCLUSION: Cross-union between thoracodorsal and musculocutaneous nerves appears to be a reliable method of restoring elbow function even when delayed for 2 years after injury. Return of elbow flexion should be an obtainable goal in most brachial plexus injuries.
OpenAlex reports 49 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
BACKGROUND: In many cases of severe closed injury involving the upper trunk of the brachial plexus, the proximal stump is too damaged to permit direct repair. Under these circumstances, several alternative sources of neurotization have been described, three of which are analyzed here. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirteen patients with brachial plexus injury had paralysis of elbow flexion owing to damage of either the upper trunk or the lateral cord. In four patients, the musculocutaneous nerve was reinnervated through cross-union with the thoracodorsal nerve; all regained strong elbow flexion. One of three the patients with cross-union between the lateral or medial pectoral nerve regained useful elbow flexion. Of six patients with nerve grafting between spinal accessory and musculocutaneous nerves, four regained useful elbow flexion. CONCLUSION: Cross-union between thoracodorsal and musculocutaneous nerves appears to be a reliable method of restoring elbow function even when delayed for 2 years after injury. Return of elbow flexion should be an obtainable goal in most brachial plexus injuries.
Key concepts: Brachial plexus, Biceps, Medicine, Brachial plexus injury, Function (biology), Surgery, Biology, Evolutionary biology