1994Journal of Experimental ZoologyRequires access

Binding of starfish and sea cucumber sperm attractants to whole sperm and sperm fragments

Richard L. Miller, Dwight N. Crawford

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Binding of starfish and sea cucumber sperm attractants to whole, living spermatozoa and to separated, purified, sperm heads and tails was measured by assaying for loss of sperm attracting activity from solution. Starfish sperm attractant bound mainly to whole sperm or isolated sperm tails and much less, or not at all, to isolated sperm heads. Binding of starfish attractant to sea cucumber sperm or sperm fragments did not occur, nor did sea cucumber sperm attractant bind to starfish sperm or sperm fragments. However, sea cucumber attractant bound equivalently to separated sea cucumber sperm heads and tails. Starfish sperm attractant remained bound to whole sperm or isolated sperm tails if they were frozen‐thawed, but was released if the sperm or sperm fragments were heated. Starfish attractant did not bind to sperm that was previously killed by heat or freezing and thawing but did bind to formalin‐fixed, sea water‐washed sperm. Removal of the sperm membrane using Triton X‐100 eliminated the ability to bind sperm attractant. Although the ratio of the surface areas of tails to heads was approximately 1.5 to 1, up to 10 times more sperm attractant bound to starfish sperm tails than to heads. These results are similar to the binding pattern of the motility‐activating, egg jelly‐derived peptides speract (SAP‐I) and alloresact (SAP‐IIB) to sea urchin sperm heads and tails. They suggest that starfish and sea cucumber sperm attractants bind to sperm membranes in a manner similar to the sperm activating peptides of sea urchins. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Binding of starfish and sea cucumber sperm attractants to whole, living spermatozoa and to separated, purified, sperm heads and tails was measured by assaying for loss of sperm attracting activity from solution. Starfish sperm attractant bound mainly to whole sperm or isolated sperm tails and much less, or not at all, to isolated sperm heads. Binding of starfish attractant to sea cucumber sperm or sperm fragments did not occur, nor did sea cucumber sperm attractant bind to starfish sperm or sperm fragments. However, sea cucumber attractant bound equivalently to separated sea cucumber sperm heads and tails. Starfish sperm attractant remained bound to whole sperm or isolated sperm tails if they were frozen‐thawed, but was released if the sperm or sperm fragments were heated. Starfish attractant did not bind to sperm that was previously killed by heat or freezing and thawing but did bind to formalin‐fixed, sea water‐washed sperm. Removal of the sperm membrane using Triton X‐100 eliminated the ability to bind sperm attractant. Although the ratio of the surface areas of tails to heads was approximately 1.5 to 1, up to 10 times more sperm attractant bound to starfish sperm tails than to heads. These results are similar to the binding pattern of the motility‐activating, egg jelly‐derived peptides speract (SAP‐I) and alloresact (SAP‐IIB) to sea urchin sperm heads and tails. They suggest that starfish and sea cucumber sperm attractants bind to sperm membranes in a manner similar to the sperm activating peptides of sea urchins. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Binding of starfish and sea cucumber sperm attractants to whole, living spermatozoa and to separated, purified, sperm heads and tails was measured by assaying for loss of sperm attracting activity from solution. Starfish sperm attractant bound mainly to whole sperm or isolated sperm tails and much less, or not at all, to isolated sperm heads. Binding of starfish attractant to sea cucumber sperm or sperm fragments did not occur, nor did sea cucumber sperm attractant bind to starfish sperm or sperm fragments. However, sea cucumber attractant bound equivalently to separated sea cucumber sperm heads and tails. Starfish sperm attractant remained bound to whole sperm or isolated sperm tails if they were frozen‐thawed, but was released if the sperm or sperm fragments were heated. Starfish attractant did not bind to sperm that was previously killed by heat or freezing and thawing but did bind to formalin‐fixed, sea water‐washed sperm. Removal of the sperm membrane using Triton X‐100 eliminated the ability to bind sperm attractant. Although the ratio of the surface areas of tails to heads was approximately 1.5 to 1, up to 10 times more sperm attractant bound to starfish sperm tails than to heads. These results are similar to the binding pattern of the motility‐activating, egg jelly‐derived peptides speract (SAP‐I) and alloresact (SAP‐IIB) to sea urchin sperm heads and tails. They suggest that starfish and sea cucumber sperm attractants bind to sperm membranes in a manner similar to the sperm activating peptides of sea urchins. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Key concepts: Sperm, Starfish, Sea cucumber, Sea urchin, Biology, Botany, Chemistry, Cell biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Binding of starfish and sea cucumber sperm attractants to whole sperm and sperm fragments — Research Paper | ScholarLens