1993•American Journal of PhysicsRequires access

Philosophical midwifery and the birthpangs of modern cosmology

George Gale, John R. Urani

Open publisher page 32 citations

Abstract

Philosophical considerations sometimes direct developments in physics. Such influence most frequently operates during the genesis of new fields. The birth of modern cosmology provides clear evidence of the interaction between philosophical issues and the shape and direction of a new physical discipline. Philosophical controversy between E. A. Milne and other astrophysicists, including A. S. Eddington, James Jeans, and H. P. Robertson, directly affected the models, methods, and very nature of cosmological science for future generations. Today’s standard space-time metric, for example, resulted from responses by Robertson and A. G. Walker to philosophical challenges presented in Milne’s proposals to scrap the very idea of expanding ‘‘space.’’ Analysis of published works, unpublished manuscripts and correspondence, and personal interviews illustrates the role philosophical considerations played in development of this new field in physics.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Philosophical considerations sometimes direct developments in physics. Such influence most frequently operates during the genesis of new fields. The birth of modern cosmology provides clear evidence of the interaction between philosophical issues and the shape and direction of a new physical discipline. Philosophical controversy between E. A. Milne and other astrophysicists, including A. S. Eddington, James Jeans, and H. P. Robertson, directly affected the models, methods, and very nature of cosmological science for future generations. Today’s standard space-time metric, for example, resulted from responses by Robertson and A. G. Walker to philosophical challenges presented in Milne’s proposals to scrap the very idea of expanding ‘‘space.’’ Analysis of published works, unpublished manuscripts and correspondence, and personal interviews illustrates the role philosophical considerations played in development of this new field in physics.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 32 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Philosophical considerations sometimes direct developments in physics. Such influence most frequently operates during the genesis of new fields. The birth of modern cosmology provides clear evidence of the interaction between philosophical issues and the shape and direction of a new physical discipline. Philosophical controversy between E. A. Milne and other astrophysicists, including A. S. Eddington, James Jeans, and H. P. Robertson, directly affected the models, methods, and very nature of cosmological science for future generations. Today’s standard space-time metric, for example, resulted from responses by Robertson and A. G. Walker to philosophical challenges presented in Milne’s proposals to scrap the very idea of expanding ‘‘space.’’ Analysis of published works, unpublished manuscripts and correspondence, and personal interviews illustrates the role philosophical considerations played in development of this new field in physics.

Key concepts: Cosmology, Physics, Epistemology, Field (mathematics), Philosophical methodology, Space (punctuation), Theoretical physics, Metric (unit)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Philosophical midwifery and the birthpangs of modern cosmology — Research Paper | ScholarLens