Workpiece Compatibility of Ceramic Cutting Tools
Milton C. SHAW, Patrick A. Smith
Abstract
Milton C. SHAW, Patrick A. Smith
Abstract
It is now well known that certain types of cemented carbides give excellent results when used to cut cast irons but poor results when used to cut steels and vice versa. This relative ability of a given tool material to perform well when cutting a given workpiece material is referred to here as compatibility. Ceramic metal cutting tools have been in use in machining metals such a short time that it is not yet generally known on which materials these tools can be used to best advantage. In this report the performance of ceramic and cemented carbide tools is compared when machining a wide variety of metals. It is found that there are certain metals for which either the surface chemical or thermal characteristics of ceramic tools are particularly advantageous. The report is concluded by a table which lists a large number of ferrous and nonferrous metals in order of decreasing compatibility with aluminum oxide tools.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
It is now well known that certain types of cemented carbides give excellent results when used to cut cast irons but poor results when used to cut steels and vice versa. This relative ability of a given tool material to perform well when cutting a given workpiece material is referred to here as compatibility. Ceramic metal cutting tools have been in use in machining metals such a short time that it is not yet generally known on which materials these tools can be used to best advantage. In this report the performance of ceramic and cemented carbide tools is compared when machining a wide variety of metals. It is found that there are certain metals for which either the surface chemical or thermal characteristics of ceramic tools are particularly advantageous. The report is concluded by a table which lists a large number of ferrous and nonferrous metals in order of decreasing compatibility with aluminum oxide tools.
Key concepts: Compatibility (geochemistry), Ceramic, Machining, Metallurgy, Carbide, Materials science, Aluminum oxide, Cutting tool