2009•ChemotherapyRequires access

Antibacterial Effects of Meropenem and Imipenem against Haemophilus influenzae

E. Yourassowsky, Mark van der Linden, Françoise Crokaert

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Phase contrast microscopy, killing curves and turbidimetric growth curves were used in a comparative study of the antibacterial effects of imipenem and meropenem on Haemophilus influenzae. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and their ranges of meropenem and imipenem using five beta-lactamase-producing strains of H. influenzae were 0.03 (0.015-0.06) and 0.6 (0.5-1) micrograms/ml, respectively. Imipenem and meropenem induced spheroplast formation in cultures. Killing curves showed a bacteriostatic activity for meropenem and imipenem for MIC values, and a lag of 2 h in killing for MIC x 2 to MIC x 64. For these concentrations the killing rates of the two antibiotics were similar. Turbidimetric growth curves showed a higher early increase in optical density for meropenem. As far as the MIC value of meropenem was 10 times lower than the MIC value of imipenem, we may conclude that meropenem was more active than imipenem on beta-lactamase-producing strains of H. influenzae.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Phase contrast microscopy, killing curves and turbidimetric growth curves were used in a comparative study of the antibacterial effects of imipenem and meropenem on Haemophilus influenzae. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and their ranges of meropenem and imipenem using five beta-lactamase-producing strains of H. influenzae were 0.03 (0.015-0.06) and 0.6 (0.5-1) micrograms/ml, respectively. Imipenem and meropenem induced spheroplast formation in cultures. Killing curves showed a bacteriostatic activity for meropenem and imipenem for MIC values, and a lag of 2 h in killing for MIC x 2 to MIC x 64. For these concentrations the killing rates of the two antibiotics were similar. Turbidimetric growth curves showed a higher early increase in optical density for meropenem. As far as the MIC value of meropenem was 10 times lower than the MIC value of imipenem, we may conclude that meropenem was more active than imipenem on beta-lactamase-producing strains of H. influenzae.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Phase contrast microscopy, killing curves and turbidimetric growth curves were used in a comparative study of the antibacterial effects of imipenem and meropenem on Haemophilus influenzae. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and their ranges of meropenem and imipenem using five beta-lactamase-producing strains of H. influenzae were 0.03 (0.015-0.06) and 0.6 (0.5-1) micrograms/ml, respectively. Imipenem and meropenem induced spheroplast formation in cultures. Killing curves showed a bacteriostatic activity for meropenem and imipenem for MIC values, and a lag of 2 h in killing for MIC x 2 to MIC x 64. For these concentrations the killing rates of the two antibiotics were similar. Turbidimetric growth curves showed a higher early increase in optical density for meropenem. As far as the MIC value of meropenem was 10 times lower than the MIC value of imipenem, we may conclude that meropenem was more active than imipenem on beta-lactamase-producing strains of H. influenzae.

Key concepts: Meropenem, Imipenem, Microbiology, Haemophilus influenzae, Carbapenem, Antibiotics, Minimum inhibitory concentration, Antibacterial agent

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Antibacterial Effects of Meropenem and Imipenem against Haemophilus influenzae — Research Paper | ScholarLens