2010Journal of Food QualityRequires access

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INSTRUMENTAL AND SENSORY DETERMINATION OF APPLE AND PEAR TEXTURE

Maite A. Chauvin, Carolyn F. Ross, Marvin J. Pitts, Eugene M. Kupferman, Barry Swanson

Open publisher page 59 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The relationship between compressive forces, tensile forces and sensory perception of apple and pear texture was evaluated over two harvest years. A trained panel assessed the sensory attribute of apple and pear samples. Compressive forces were determined using a Guss Fruit Texture analyzer and Sinclair iQ™. Tensile determinations were obtained using a unique method employing both tensile and compression elastic modulus of the fruit tissue. Results showed that crispness, hardness and fracturability were significantly correlated (r = 0.80–0.90). Sinclair iQ™ System and Guss Fruit Texture measurements on apple (r = 0.78–0.83) and pears (r = 0.83) showed a significant correlation with sensory results for hardness. Tensile determinations predicted crispness in apples (r = 0.88) and pears (r = 0.85). A combination method of compressive and tensile determinations may offer the most accurate prediction of textural properties of apples and pears. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS Apple and pear firmness is a primary measure of fresh quality. With apples and pears being such an important commodity in Washington State and firmness playing such an important role in fruit quality, more knowledge about tissue mechanics and its correlation with human perception is important for further development of the apple and pear industry. In response to the need to develop an instrumental determination of texture with a strong correlation to sensory evaluation, a new methodology was developed whereby the tensile properties of apples and pears were measured.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT The relationship between compressive forces, tensile forces and sensory perception of apple and pear texture was evaluated over two harvest years. A trained panel assessed the sensory attribute of apple and pear samples. Compressive forces were determined using a Guss Fruit Texture analyzer and Sinclair iQ™. Tensile determinations were obtained using a unique method employing both tensile and compression elastic modulus of the fruit tissue. Results showed that crispness, hardness and fracturability were significantly correlated (r = 0.80–0.90). Sinclair iQ™ System and Guss Fruit Texture measurements on apple (r = 0.78–0.83) and pears (r = 0.83) showed a significant correlation with sensory results for hardness. Tensile determinations predicted crispness in apples (r = 0.88) and pears (r = 0.85). A combination method of compressive and tensile determinations may offer the most accurate prediction of textural properties of apples and pears. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS Apple and pear firmness is a primary measure of fresh quality. With apples and pears being such an important commodity in Washington State and firmness playing such an important role in fruit quality, more knowledge about tissue mechanics and its correlation with human perception is important for further development of the apple and pear industry. In response to the need to develop an instrumental determination of texture with a strong correlation to sensory evaluation, a new methodology was developed whereby the tensile properties of apples and pears were measured.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 59 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT The relationship between compressive forces, tensile forces and sensory perception of apple and pear texture was evaluated over two harvest years. A trained panel assessed the sensory attribute of apple and pear samples. Compressive forces were determined using a Guss Fruit Texture analyzer and Sinclair iQ™. Tensile determinations were obtained using a unique method employing both tensile and compression elastic modulus of the fruit tissue. Results showed that crispness, hardness and fracturability were significantly correlated (r = 0.80–0.90). Sinclair iQ™ System and Guss Fruit Texture measurements on apple (r = 0.78–0.83) and pears (r = 0.83) showed a significant correlation with sensory results for hardness. Tensile determinations predicted crispness in apples (r = 0.88) and pears (r = 0.85). A combination method of compressive and tensile determinations may offer the most accurate prediction of textural properties of apples and pears. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS Apple and pear firmness is a primary measure of fresh quality. With apples and pears being such an important commodity in Washington State and firmness playing such an important role in fruit quality, more knowledge about tissue mechanics and its correlation with human perception is important for further development of the apple and pear industry. In response to the need to develop an instrumental determination of texture with a strong correlation to sensory evaluation, a new methodology was developed whereby the tensile properties of apples and pears were measured.

Key concepts: PEAR, Ultimate tensile strength, Texture (cosmology), Compressive strength, Mathematics, Sensory analysis, Compression (physics), Positive correlation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INSTRUMENTAL AND SENSORY DETERMINATION OF APPLE AND PEAR TEXTURE — Research Paper | ScholarLens