2010Journal of the World Aquaculture SocietyRequires access

Water Quality, Fish Production and Economics of Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, and African Catfish, Clarias gariepinus, Monoculture and Polycultures

Nabil A. Ibrahim, Gamal El Naggar

Open publisher page 58 citations

Abstract

Twelve 400 m2 earthen ponds were used to test the effect of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, African catfish, Clarius gariepinus, monoculture and polyculture on water quality, fish production and economic performance across a range of stocking ratios: 100% tilapia + 0% catfish, 75% tilapia + 25% catfish, 50% tilapia + 50% catfish, and 0% tilapia +100% catfish. All ponds were stocked at the rate of 3 fish/m2. Two-way ANOVA showed that culture period explained more than 60% of variation in water quality variables while treatment was responsible only for about 11%. Net fish yields were 5.71, 9.84, 11.03, and 11.35 tones/ha corresponding with daily weight gains of 36.60, 63.08, 70.69, and 72.75 kg/ha/d in the 0% catfish, 25% catfish, 50% catfish, and 100% catfish treatments, respectively. Feed consumed was 7.59, 10.84, 13.48, and 17.03 tones/ha for the four treatments, respectively. Fish yield and feed consumption were highest in the catfish monoculture (P < 0.05) followed by the 50% catfish, 25% catfish, and 0% catfish treatments. Net profit for both polyculture treatments was significantly higher than both monoculture treatments, although no significant differences were observed among polyculture or between the two monoculture treatments. The 25% catfish polyculture treatment generated the highest economic returns.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Twelve 400 m2 earthen ponds were used to test the effect of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, African catfish, Clarius gariepinus, monoculture and polyculture on water quality, fish production and economic performance across a range of stocking ratios: 100% tilapia + 0% catfish, 75% tilapia + 25% catfish, 50% tilapia + 50% catfish, and 0% tilapia +100% catfish. All ponds were stocked at the rate of 3 fish/m2. Two-way ANOVA showed that culture period explained more than 60% of variation in water quality variables while treatment was responsible only for about 11%. Net fish yields were 5.71, 9.84, 11.03, and 11.35 tones/ha corresponding with daily weight gains of 36.60, 63.08, 70.69, and 72.75 kg/ha/d in the 0% catfish, 25% catfish, 50% catfish, and 100% catfish treatments, respectively. Feed consumed was 7.59, 10.84, 13.48, and 17.03 tones/ha for the four treatments, respectively. Fish yield and feed consumption were highest in the catfish monoculture (P < 0.05) followed by the 50% catfish, 25% catfish, and 0% catfish treatments. Net profit for both polyculture treatments was significantly higher than both monoculture treatments, although no significant differences were observed among polyculture or between the two monoculture treatments. The 25% catfish polyculture treatment generated the highest economic returns.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 58 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Twelve 400 m2 earthen ponds were used to test the effect of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, African catfish, Clarius gariepinus, monoculture and polyculture on water quality, fish production and economic performance across a range of stocking ratios: 100% tilapia + 0% catfish, 75% tilapia + 25% catfish, 50% tilapia + 50% catfish, and 0% tilapia +100% catfish. All ponds were stocked at the rate of 3 fish/m2. Two-way ANOVA showed that culture period explained more than 60% of variation in water quality variables while treatment was responsible only for about 11%. Net fish yields were 5.71, 9.84, 11.03, and 11.35 tones/ha corresponding with daily weight gains of 36.60, 63.08, 70.69, and 72.75 kg/ha/d in the 0% catfish, 25% catfish, 50% catfish, and 100% catfish treatments, respectively. Feed consumed was 7.59, 10.84, 13.48, and 17.03 tones/ha for the four treatments, respectively. Fish yield and feed consumption were highest in the catfish monoculture (P < 0.05) followed by the 50% catfish, 25% catfish, and 0% catfish treatments. Net profit for both polyculture treatments was significantly higher than both monoculture treatments, although no significant differences were observed among polyculture or between the two monoculture treatments. The 25% catfish polyculture treatment generated the highest economic returns.

Key concepts: Clarias gariepinus, Biology, Oreochromis, Nile tilapia, Polyculture, Catfish, Fishery, Aquaculture

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Water Quality, Fish Production and Economics of Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, and African Catfish, Clarias gariepinus, Monoculture and Polycultures — Research Paper | ScholarLens