A simple semiquantitative model for classifying metal–compound semiconductor interface reactivity
J. F. McGilp, I.T. McGovern
Abstract
J. F. McGilp, I.T. McGovern
Abstract
A scheme for classifying the interfacial reactivity of metal–compound semiconductor systems is presented. The scheme uses a simple bulk model to calculate a ‘‘heat of reaction,’’ which includes the effects of metal–semiconductor anion compound formation and metal–semiconductor cation alloying. The scheme is applied to the layered semiconductors GaSe and MoS2, III–V semiconductor InP, and the II–VI semiconductor CdTe, for a wide range of metals. The resulting classification compares favorably with published experimental data on ultrahigh vacuum cleaved surfaces. For the majority of these interfaces, the reactivity classification is the same as that obtained by considering only metal–semiconductor anion compound formation. However, for the combinations Au–InP, Ni–CdTe, Ni–GaSe, Cu–CdTe, and Cu–GaSe, it is only by including alloying that the combination is classified as reactive, in agreement with experimental data.
OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A scheme for classifying the interfacial reactivity of metal–compound semiconductor systems is presented. The scheme uses a simple bulk model to calculate a ‘‘heat of reaction,’’ which includes the effects of metal–semiconductor anion compound formation and metal–semiconductor cation alloying. The scheme is applied to the layered semiconductors GaSe and MoS2, III–V semiconductor InP, and the II–VI semiconductor CdTe, for a wide range of metals. The resulting classification compares favorably with published experimental data on ultrahigh vacuum cleaved surfaces. For the majority of these interfaces, the reactivity classification is the same as that obtained by considering only metal–semiconductor anion compound formation. However, for the combinations Au–InP, Ni–CdTe, Ni–GaSe, Cu–CdTe, and Cu–GaSe, it is only by including alloying that the combination is classified as reactive, in agreement with experimental data.
Key concepts: Semiconductor, Cadmium telluride photovoltaics, Reactivity (psychology), Compound semiconductor, Metal, Materials science, Semiconductor materials, Optoelectronics