1985Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Microelectronics Processing and PhenomenaRequires access

A simple semiquantitative model for classifying metal–compound semiconductor interface reactivity

J. F. McGilp, I.T. McGovern

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

A scheme for classifying the interfacial reactivity of metal–compound semiconductor systems is presented. The scheme uses a simple bulk model to calculate a ‘‘heat of reaction,’’ which includes the effects of metal–semiconductor anion compound formation and metal–semiconductor cation alloying. The scheme is applied to the layered semiconductors GaSe and MoS2, III–V semiconductor InP, and the II–VI semiconductor CdTe, for a wide range of metals. The resulting classification compares favorably with published experimental data on ultrahigh vacuum cleaved surfaces. For the majority of these interfaces, the reactivity classification is the same as that obtained by considering only metal–semiconductor anion compound formation. However, for the combinations Au–InP, Ni–CdTe, Ni–GaSe, Cu–CdTe, and Cu–GaSe, it is only by including alloying that the combination is classified as reactive, in agreement with experimental data.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A scheme for classifying the interfacial reactivity of metal–compound semiconductor systems is presented. The scheme uses a simple bulk model to calculate a ‘‘heat of reaction,’’ which includes the effects of metal–semiconductor anion compound formation and metal–semiconductor cation alloying. The scheme is applied to the layered semiconductors GaSe and MoS2, III–V semiconductor InP, and the II–VI semiconductor CdTe, for a wide range of metals. The resulting classification compares favorably with published experimental data on ultrahigh vacuum cleaved surfaces. For the majority of these interfaces, the reactivity classification is the same as that obtained by considering only metal–semiconductor anion compound formation. However, for the combinations Au–InP, Ni–CdTe, Ni–GaSe, Cu–CdTe, and Cu–GaSe, it is only by including alloying that the combination is classified as reactive, in agreement with experimental data.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A scheme for classifying the interfacial reactivity of metal–compound semiconductor systems is presented. The scheme uses a simple bulk model to calculate a ‘‘heat of reaction,’’ which includes the effects of metal–semiconductor anion compound formation and metal–semiconductor cation alloying. The scheme is applied to the layered semiconductors GaSe and MoS2, III–V semiconductor InP, and the II–VI semiconductor CdTe, for a wide range of metals. The resulting classification compares favorably with published experimental data on ultrahigh vacuum cleaved surfaces. For the majority of these interfaces, the reactivity classification is the same as that obtained by considering only metal–semiconductor anion compound formation. However, for the combinations Au–InP, Ni–CdTe, Ni–GaSe, Cu–CdTe, and Cu–GaSe, it is only by including alloying that the combination is classified as reactive, in agreement with experimental data.

Key concepts: Semiconductor, Cadmium telluride photovoltaics, Reactivity (psychology), Compound semiconductor, Metal, Materials science, Semiconductor materials, Optoelectronics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A simple semiquantitative model for classifying metal–compound semiconductor interface reactivity — Research Paper | ScholarLens