A randomized double-blind multicentre comparative study of Lamisil(terbinafine) versus ketoconazole in tinea corporis
Rfe de Wit
Abstract
Rfe de Wit
Abstract
Seventy-four evaluable patients with dermatophyte infections of skin entered a randomized double-blind study and were treated with 125 mg terbinafine (Lamisil) twice daily (37 patients) or 100 mg ketoconazole twice daily (37 patients). No statistically significant differences in efficacy were found, but the data suggest that Lamisil may have a more rapid onset of action. The Lamisil-treated group continued to improve even after treatment was stopped. Lamisil provoked no rise in liver enzymes. In this study Lamisil was a safe and very effective drug.
OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Seventy-four evaluable patients with dermatophyte infections of skin entered a randomized double-blind study and were treated with 125 mg terbinafine (Lamisil) twice daily (37 patients) or 100 mg ketoconazole twice daily (37 patients). No statistically significant differences in efficacy were found, but the data suggest that Lamisil may have a more rapid onset of action. The Lamisil-treated group continued to improve even after treatment was stopped. Lamisil provoked no rise in liver enzymes. In this study Lamisil was a safe and very effective drug.
Key concepts: Medicine, Ketoconazole, Terbinafine, Dermatophyte, Tinea capitis, Dermatology, Mycosis, Double blind study