1990•Journal of Dermatological TreatmentRequires access

A randomized double-blind multicentre comparative study of Lamisil(terbinafine) versus ketoconazole in tinea corporis

Rfe de Wit

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

Seventy-four evaluable patients with dermatophyte infections of skin entered a randomized double-blind study and were treated with 125 mg terbinafine (Lamisil) twice daily (37 patients) or 100 mg ketoconazole twice daily (37 patients). No statistically significant differences in efficacy were found, but the data suggest that Lamisil may have a more rapid onset of action. The Lamisil-treated group continued to improve even after treatment was stopped. Lamisil provoked no rise in liver enzymes. In this study Lamisil was a safe and very effective drug.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Seventy-four evaluable patients with dermatophyte infections of skin entered a randomized double-blind study and were treated with 125 mg terbinafine (Lamisil) twice daily (37 patients) or 100 mg ketoconazole twice daily (37 patients). No statistically significant differences in efficacy were found, but the data suggest that Lamisil may have a more rapid onset of action. The Lamisil-treated group continued to improve even after treatment was stopped. Lamisil provoked no rise in liver enzymes. In this study Lamisil was a safe and very effective drug.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Seventy-four evaluable patients with dermatophyte infections of skin entered a randomized double-blind study and were treated with 125 mg terbinafine (Lamisil) twice daily (37 patients) or 100 mg ketoconazole twice daily (37 patients). No statistically significant differences in efficacy were found, but the data suggest that Lamisil may have a more rapid onset of action. The Lamisil-treated group continued to improve even after treatment was stopped. Lamisil provoked no rise in liver enzymes. In this study Lamisil was a safe and very effective drug.

Key concepts: Medicine, Ketoconazole, Terbinafine, Dermatophyte, Tinea capitis, Dermatology, Mycosis, Double blind study

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A randomized double-blind multicentre comparative study of Lamisil(terbinafine) versus ketoconazole in tinea corporis — Research Paper | ScholarLens