Changes in intraocular pressure and pupil size following intramuscular administration of hydromorphone hydrochloride and acepromazine in clinically normal dogs
Deborah D. Stephan, William A. Vestre, Jean Stiles, Sheryl G. Krohne
Abstract
Deborah D. Stephan, William A. Vestre, Jean Stiles, Sheryl G. Krohne
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of intramuscularly administered hydromorphone hydrochloride and acepromazine on intraocular pressure (IOP) and pupil size (PS). ANIMALS STUDIED: Seventeen dogs free of clinically relevant ocular abnormalities. PROCEDURE: Measurements of IOP and PS were obtained and the dogs were injected intramuscularly with hydromorphone (0.04-0.08 mg/kg) and acepromazine (0.04 mg/kg). Measurements of IOP and PS were repeated 10 min and 25 min later. RESULTS: Though a decreasing trend in IOP values was demonstrated, no significant difference was noted in IOP from the initial examination to examination following intramuscular administration of hydromorphone and acepromazine. Significant miosis was present in 16 of 17 dogs at 10 min and 25 min following administration of hydromorphone and acepromazine. CONCLUSION: Hydromorphone (0.04-0.08 mg/kg) and acepromazine (0.04 mg/kg) cause significant miosis in dogs at 10 and 25 min following intramuscular administration.
OpenAlex reports 27 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of intramuscularly administered hydromorphone hydrochloride and acepromazine on intraocular pressure (IOP) and pupil size (PS). ANIMALS STUDIED: Seventeen dogs free of clinically relevant ocular abnormalities. PROCEDURE: Measurements of IOP and PS were obtained and the dogs were injected intramuscularly with hydromorphone (0.04-0.08 mg/kg) and acepromazine (0.04 mg/kg). Measurements of IOP and PS were repeated 10 min and 25 min later. RESULTS: Though a decreasing trend in IOP values was demonstrated, no significant difference was noted in IOP from the initial examination to examination following intramuscular administration of hydromorphone and acepromazine. Significant miosis was present in 16 of 17 dogs at 10 min and 25 min following administration of hydromorphone and acepromazine. CONCLUSION: Hydromorphone (0.04-0.08 mg/kg) and acepromazine (0.04 mg/kg) cause significant miosis in dogs at 10 and 25 min following intramuscular administration.
Key concepts: Hydromorphone, Acepromazine, Miosis, Anesthesia, Medicine, Intraocular pressure, Intramuscular injection, Blood pressure