1987The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

Absolute magnitude estimation of loudness by adults and children

George A. Gescheider, Amy A. Collins

Open publisher page 33 citations

Abstract

Twenty-three subjects performed absolute magnitude estimation of the lengths of a series of lines and the loudness of a series of tones as well as cross-modality matching between loudness and perceived line length. The results support the hypothesis that subjects judge stimuli on an absolute scale. Specifically, for 9 out of 12 adults and 9 out of 11 children, lines and tones assigned the same number in magnitude estimation were judged to be subjectively equal in cross-modality matching. A correction procedure was employed to eliminate the effects of idiosyncratic number usage from the magnitude estimations of loudness. This correction procedure, consisting of dividing the loudness exponent by the line length exponent, produced power function exponents for loudness that were virtually identical for magnitude estimation and cross-modality matching. Implications of the results for clinical measurement of loudness are discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Twenty-three subjects performed absolute magnitude estimation of the lengths of a series of lines and the loudness of a series of tones as well as cross-modality matching between loudness and perceived line length. The results support the hypothesis that subjects judge stimuli on an absolute scale. Specifically, for 9 out of 12 adults and 9 out of 11 children, lines and tones assigned the same number in magnitude estimation were judged to be subjectively equal in cross-modality matching. A correction procedure was employed to eliminate the effects of idiosyncratic number usage from the magnitude estimations of loudness. This correction procedure, consisting of dividing the loudness exponent by the line length exponent, produced power function exponents for loudness that were virtually identical for magnitude estimation and cross-modality matching. Implications of the results for clinical measurement of loudness are discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 33 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Twenty-three subjects performed absolute magnitude estimation of the lengths of a series of lines and the loudness of a series of tones as well as cross-modality matching between loudness and perceived line length. The results support the hypothesis that subjects judge stimuli on an absolute scale. Specifically, for 9 out of 12 adults and 9 out of 11 children, lines and tones assigned the same number in magnitude estimation were judged to be subjectively equal in cross-modality matching. A correction procedure was employed to eliminate the effects of idiosyncratic number usage from the magnitude estimations of loudness. This correction procedure, consisting of dividing the loudness exponent by the line length exponent, produced power function exponents for loudness that were virtually identical for magnitude estimation and cross-modality matching. Implications of the results for clinical measurement of loudness are discussed.

Key concepts: Loudness, Magnitude (astronomy), Mathematics, Absolute magnitude, Exponent, Power function, Matching (statistics), Statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Absolute magnitude estimation of loudness by adults and children — Research Paper | ScholarLens