2008•The Journal of Cardiovascular NursingRequires access

Self-care and Quality of Life Outcomes in Heart Failure Patients

Kathleen L. Grady

Open publisher page 93 citations

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) disease management programs have been tested, frequently via randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and reported in the literature. One of the interventions often included in disease management programs is self-care. Quality of life (QOL) is an individual outcome that may benefit from self-care interventions. Thus, the purposes of this review article are to (1) identify and critique research designed to test self-care interventions to improve QOL in HF patients, (2) identify gaps in the literature, and (3) provide recommendations for future research. A literature search was conducted for the time period of 1995 to 2007. The search terms were HF and QOL with self-care and self-management. Twenty-one articles that included HF self-care, self-management, or self-monitoring as an intervention with QOL as an outcome were identified. Seventeen of the studies were RCTs, and 4 of the studies used longitudinal, pre/post or repeated measures designs. Of the 17 RCTs, 9 studies demonstrated greater improvement in QOL in the intervention group as compared with the usual care group. Regarding the studies that used repeated measures designs, all 4 of the studies demonstrated greater improvement in QOL from baseline to follow-up. Findings from RCTs of self-care, as an intervention, on HF patient QOL do not allow one to draw strong conclusions about the benefits of this intervention on QOL outcomes. Several factors may have contributed to these equivocal findings (including methodological and conceptual issues). The future study of self-care and its effect on QOL outcomes in HF patients will benefit from multisite, large sample-size RCTs with self-care as the primary intervention, careful definition of terms, and use of conceptual frameworks. Thus, self-care strategies to improve HF patient QOL need to be further tested, and the most efficacious strategies can subsequently provide the basis for changing clinical practice and improving patients' lives.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Heart failure (HF) disease management programs have been tested, frequently via randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and reported in the literature. One of the interventions often included in disease management programs is self-care. Quality of life (QOL) is an individual outcome that may benefit from self-care interventions. Thus, the purposes of this review article are to (1) identify and critique research designed to test self-care interventions to improve QOL in HF patients, (2) identify gaps in the literature, and (3) provide recommendations for future research. A literature search was conducted for the time period of 1995 to 2007. The search terms were HF and QOL with self-care and self-management. Twenty-one articles that included HF self-care, self-management, or self-monitoring as an intervention with QOL as an outcome were identified. Seventeen of the studies were RCTs, and 4 of the studies used longitudinal, pre/post or repeated measures designs. Of the 17 RCTs, 9 studies demonstrated greater improvement in QOL in the intervention group as compared with the usual care group. Regarding the studies that used repeated measures designs, all 4 of the studies demonstrated greater improvement in QOL from baseline to follow-up. Findings from RCTs of self-care, as an intervention, on HF patient QOL do not allow one to draw strong conclusions about the benefits of this intervention on QOL outcomes. Several factors may have contributed to these equivocal findings (including methodological and conceptual issues). The future study of self-care and its effect on QOL outcomes in HF patients will benefit from multisite, large sample-size RCTs with self-care as the primary intervention, careful definition of terms, and use of conceptual frameworks. Thus, self-care strategies to improve HF patient QOL need to be further tested, and the most efficacious strategies can subsequently provide the basis for changing clinical practice and improving patients' lives.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 93 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Heart failure (HF) disease management programs have been tested, frequently via randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and reported in the literature. One of the interventions often included in disease management programs is self-care. Quality of life (QOL) is an individual outcome that may benefit from self-care interventions. Thus, the purposes of this review article are to (1) identify and critique research designed to test self-care interventions to improve QOL in HF patients, (2) identify gaps in the literature, and (3) provide recommendations for future research. A literature search was conducted for the time period of 1995 to 2007. The search terms were HF and QOL with self-care and self-management. Twenty-one articles that included HF self-care, self-management, or self-monitoring as an intervention with QOL as an outcome were identified. Seventeen of the studies were RCTs, and 4 of the studies used longitudinal, pre/post or repeated measures designs. Of the 17 RCTs, 9 studies demonstrated greater improvement in QOL in the intervention group as compared with the usual care group. Regarding the studies that used repeated measures designs, all 4 of the studies demonstrated greater improvement in QOL from baseline to follow-up. Findings from RCTs of self-care, as an intervention, on HF patient QOL do not allow one to draw strong conclusions about the benefits of this intervention on QOL outcomes. Several factors may have contributed to these equivocal findings (including methodological and conceptual issues). The future study of self-care and its effect on QOL outcomes in HF patients will benefit from multisite, large sample-size RCTs with self-care as the primary intervention, careful definition of terms, and use of conceptual frameworks. Thus, self-care strategies to improve HF patient QOL need to be further tested, and the most efficacious strategies can subsequently provide the basis for changing clinical practice and improving patients' lives.

Key concepts: Medicine, Psychological intervention, Quality of life (healthcare), Intervention (counseling), Randomized controlled trial, Physical therapy, Disease management, MEDLINE

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Self-care and Quality of Life Outcomes in Heart Failure Patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens