1997•American Journal of Industrial MedicineRequires access

An early study of pulmonary asbestosis among manufacturing workers: Original data and reconstruction of the 1932 cohort

Stephen W. Borron, Samuel A. Forman, James E. Lockey, Grace Kawas LeMasters, Leslie M. Yee

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

A cross-sectional prevalence survey of asbestosis, including all 1,140 employees of a diversified asbestos products manufacturer, was conducted in 1932 by Drs. Anthony J. Lanza and Frank V. Meriwether. Occupational histories were obtained from workers in order to identify job tasks with exposure to asbestos and other fibrogenic dusts. Abbreviated medical histories, physical examinations, fluoroscopy, and chest radiographs were performed. Radiographs were interpreted according to applicable criteria for pneumoconiosis, the presence of which was confirmed in 327 subjects (29%). Among those, 64% had previous exposure to dusts in addition to asbestos, coal being the leading non-asbestos exposure. Thirty-six percent of cases had prior exposure only to asbestos dust. The original conclusions do not survive. Contemporaneous related documents suggest that the original authors believed asbestosis to be a milder form of lung disease than silicosis. It was subsequently recommended that the company institute pre-employment physicals, including chest radiographs; not hire people with prior coal-dust exposure; warn workers against excessive exposure to asbestos dust; remove those with disease to less dusty areas; and begin periodic medical surveillance for pneumoconiosis. The study, which has never appeared in the medical or scientific literature, holds important lessons for those concerned with occupational health today and in the future.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A cross-sectional prevalence survey of asbestosis, including all 1,140 employees of a diversified asbestos products manufacturer, was conducted in 1932 by Drs. Anthony J. Lanza and Frank V. Meriwether. Occupational histories were obtained from workers in order to identify job tasks with exposure to asbestos and other fibrogenic dusts. Abbreviated medical histories, physical examinations, fluoroscopy, and chest radiographs were performed. Radiographs were interpreted according to applicable criteria for pneumoconiosis, the presence of which was confirmed in 327 subjects (29%). Among those, 64% had previous exposure to dusts in addition to asbestos, coal being the leading non-asbestos exposure. Thirty-six percent of cases had prior exposure only to asbestos dust. The original conclusions do not survive. Contemporaneous related documents suggest that the original authors believed asbestosis to be a milder form of lung disease than silicosis. It was subsequently recommended that the company institute pre-employment physicals, including chest radiographs; not hire people with prior coal-dust exposure; warn workers against excessive exposure to asbestos dust; remove those with disease to less dusty areas; and begin periodic medical surveillance for pneumoconiosis. The study, which has never appeared in the medical or scientific literature, holds important lessons for those concerned with occupational health today and in the future.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A cross-sectional prevalence survey of asbestosis, including all 1,140 employees of a diversified asbestos products manufacturer, was conducted in 1932 by Drs. Anthony J. Lanza and Frank V. Meriwether. Occupational histories were obtained from workers in order to identify job tasks with exposure to asbestos and other fibrogenic dusts. Abbreviated medical histories, physical examinations, fluoroscopy, and chest radiographs were performed. Radiographs were interpreted according to applicable criteria for pneumoconiosis, the presence of which was confirmed in 327 subjects (29%). Among those, 64% had previous exposure to dusts in addition to asbestos, coal being the leading non-asbestos exposure. Thirty-six percent of cases had prior exposure only to asbestos dust. The original conclusions do not survive. Contemporaneous related documents suggest that the original authors believed asbestosis to be a milder form of lung disease than silicosis. It was subsequently recommended that the company institute pre-employment physicals, including chest radiographs; not hire people with prior coal-dust exposure; warn workers against excessive exposure to asbestos dust; remove those with disease to less dusty areas; and begin periodic medical surveillance for pneumoconiosis. The study, which has never appeared in the medical or scientific literature, holds important lessons for those concerned with occupational health today and in the future.

Key concepts: Asbestosis, Pneumoconiosis, Medicine, Asbestos, Silicosis, Occupational disease, Environmental health, Occupational exposure

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An early study of pulmonary asbestosis among manufacturing workers: Original data and reconstruction of the 1932 cohort — Research Paper | ScholarLens