1984•Annals of SurgeryOpen access

Resting Energy Expenditure in Controls and Cancer Patients with Localized and Diffuse Disease

Jeffrey M. Arbeit, David Eric Lees, ROLAND CORSEY, Murray F. Brennan

Open full text 105 citations

Abstract

Resting energy expenditure (REE), nutritional parameters, and substrate levels were measured using a technique to minimize artifacts in 11 control patients, nine patients with localized, and four patients with diffuse neoplastic disease. Patients with diffuse disease had significantly increased percentage preillness weight loss (15.4 +/- 7.0%), decreased arm muscle circumference (21.9 +/- 2.1 vs. 26.2 +/- 3.5 cm), serum albumin (3.6 +/- 0.6 vs. 4.4 +/- 0.2 g/dl), total lymphocyte count (1024 +/- 613 vs. 1796 +/- 495 cells/mm3), and creatinine-height index (0.68 +/- 0.16 vs. 1.18 +/- 0.37) compared to controls. Both groups of cancer patients had significantly increased REE compared to controls: 25.6 +/- 3.7 (diffuse), 21.4 +/- 3.7 (localized), vs. 18.1 +/- 2.9 kcal/kg/d (controls). However, when REE was expressed as a function of metabolic body size, the significant difference persisted only in the patients with diffuse disease compared to controls: 71.8 +/- 16.4 vs. 53.9 +/- 8.1 kcal/kg3/4/d. Patients studied pre- and posttumor resection all had a postoperative drop in their REE, which was significantly correlated with the measured tumor volume. In this homogeneous, select group of patients, the tumor-bearing state exerts a moderate impact on nutritional and metabolic parameters, which are probably related to the extent of disease.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Resting energy expenditure (REE), nutritional parameters, and substrate levels were measured using a technique to minimize artifacts in 11 control patients, nine patients with localized, and four patients with diffuse neoplastic disease. Patients with diffuse disease had significantly increased percentage preillness weight loss (15.4 +/- 7.0%), decreased arm muscle circumference (21.9 +/- 2.1 vs. 26.2 +/- 3.5 cm), serum albumin (3.6 +/- 0.6 vs. 4.4 +/- 0.2 g/dl), total lymphocyte count (1024 +/- 613 vs. 1796 +/- 495 cells/mm3), and creatinine-height index (0.68 +/- 0.16 vs. 1.18 +/- 0.37) compared to controls. Both groups of cancer patients had significantly increased REE compared to controls: 25.6 +/- 3.7 (diffuse), 21.4 +/- 3.7 (localized), vs. 18.1 +/- 2.9 kcal/kg/d (controls). However, when REE was expressed as a function of metabolic body size, the significant difference persisted only in the patients with diffuse disease compared to controls: 71.8 +/- 16.4 vs. 53.9 +/- 8.1 kcal/kg3/4/d. Patients studied pre- and posttumor resection all had a postoperative drop in their REE, which was significantly correlated with the measured tumor volume. In this homogeneous, select group of patients, the tumor-bearing state exerts a moderate impact on nutritional and metabolic parameters, which are probably related to the extent of disease.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 105 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Resting energy expenditure (REE), nutritional parameters, and substrate levels were measured using a technique to minimize artifacts in 11 control patients, nine patients with localized, and four patients with diffuse neoplastic disease. Patients with diffuse disease had significantly increased percentage preillness weight loss (15.4 +/- 7.0%), decreased arm muscle circumference (21.9 +/- 2.1 vs. 26.2 +/- 3.5 cm), serum albumin (3.6 +/- 0.6 vs. 4.4 +/- 0.2 g/dl), total lymphocyte count (1024 +/- 613 vs. 1796 +/- 495 cells/mm3), and creatinine-height index (0.68 +/- 0.16 vs. 1.18 +/- 0.37) compared to controls. Both groups of cancer patients had significantly increased REE compared to controls: 25.6 +/- 3.7 (diffuse), 21.4 +/- 3.7 (localized), vs. 18.1 +/- 2.9 kcal/kg/d (controls). However, when REE was expressed as a function of metabolic body size, the significant difference persisted only in the patients with diffuse disease compared to controls: 71.8 +/- 16.4 vs. 53.9 +/- 8.1 kcal/kg3/4/d. Patients studied pre- and posttumor resection all had a postoperative drop in their REE, which was significantly correlated with the measured tumor volume. In this homogeneous, select group of patients, the tumor-bearing state exerts a moderate impact on nutritional and metabolic parameters, which are probably related to the extent of disease.

Key concepts: Medicine, Resting energy expenditure, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Creatinine, Cancer, Cachexia, Endocrinology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Resting Energy Expenditure in Controls and Cancer Patients with Localized and Diffuse Disease — Research Paper | ScholarLens