1999The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

A pistonless Stirling engine—A new direction in thermoacoustics

Scott Backhaus, Gregory W. Swift

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Due to its thermodynamic reversibility, the Stirling cycle has an inherent advantage in thermal efficiency over the standard, irreversible standing-wave thermoacoustic cycle. The main disadvantage of the Stirling cycle has been the need for high-pressure, sliding piston seals. Building significantly on the ideas of Ceperley [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 66, 1508 (1979)], a thermoacoustic version of a 1-kW Stirling engine has been constructed and tested. This engine enjoys both the efficiency advantage of the Stirling cycle and the no-moving-parts advantage of thermoacoustics. In this first attempt, experimental data show that the engine has an efficiency above 35% of the Carnot efficiency, much higher than that of any prior thermoacoustic engine. [Work supported by the Office of Basic Energy Sciences in the U.S. DOE.]

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Due to its thermodynamic reversibility, the Stirling cycle has an inherent advantage in thermal efficiency over the standard, irreversible standing-wave thermoacoustic cycle. The main disadvantage of the Stirling cycle has been the need for high-pressure, sliding piston seals. Building significantly on the ideas of Ceperley [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 66, 1508 (1979)], a thermoacoustic version of a 1-kW Stirling engine has been constructed and tested. This engine enjoys both the efficiency advantage of the Stirling cycle and the no-moving-parts advantage of thermoacoustics. In this first attempt, experimental data show that the engine has an efficiency above 35% of the Carnot efficiency, much higher than that of any prior thermoacoustic engine. [Work supported by the Office of Basic Energy Sciences in the U.S. DOE.]

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Due to its thermodynamic reversibility, the Stirling cycle has an inherent advantage in thermal efficiency over the standard, irreversible standing-wave thermoacoustic cycle. The main disadvantage of the Stirling cycle has been the need for high-pressure, sliding piston seals. Building significantly on the ideas of Ceperley [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 66, 1508 (1979)], a thermoacoustic version of a 1-kW Stirling engine has been constructed and tested. This engine enjoys both the efficiency advantage of the Stirling cycle and the no-moving-parts advantage of thermoacoustics. In this first attempt, experimental data show that the engine has an efficiency above 35% of the Carnot efficiency, much higher than that of any prior thermoacoustic engine. [Work supported by the Office of Basic Energy Sciences in the U.S. DOE.]

Key concepts: Stirling engine, Thermoacoustics, Carnot cycle, Stirling cycle, Thermoacoustic heat engine, Thermal efficiency, Piston (optics), Thermodynamic cycle

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A pistonless Stirling engine—A new direction in thermoacoustics — Research Paper | ScholarLens