2014•WaterbirdsOpen access

Nest Predators of Flightless Steamer-Ducks ( Tachyeres pteneres ) and Flying Steamer-Ducks ( Tachyeres patachonicus )

Marcela Liljesthröm, Laura Fasola, Alejandro Valenzuela, Andrea Raya Rey, Adrián Schiavini

Open full text 14 citations

Abstract

A combination of infrared cameras and plasticine eggs were used to identify potential nest predators of Flightless Steamer-Ducks (Tachyeres pteneres) and Flying Steamer-Ducks (T. patachonicus) and to evaluate the relative efficacy of these methods for identifying predators. Cameras were set up at 31 artificial nests with plasticine eggs and at four Flightless and two Flying steamer-duck nests. Two avian predators, Chimango Caracara (Milvago chimango) and Southern Crested Caracara (Caracara plancus), and two mammalian predators, Fuegian Culpeo fox (Pseudalopex culpaeus lycoides) and American mink (Neovison vison), were identified as depredating artificial nests from photos. Active Flightless and Flying steamer-duck nests were found only on islets, and from the photos the Chimango and Southern Crested caracaras were identified as nest predators. Mammalian predators were not photographed on islets (neither on artificial nor natural nests). Though the potential predator community at Lapataia Bay was small, there were considerable similarities in physical evidence and marks left at nests, especially within avian predators. Also, depredated nests were sometimes revisited by other predators and these multi-predator visits sometimes caused changes to the appearance of the depredated nest following departure of the initial predator. The cameras provided an objective method for definitive identification of nest predators.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A combination of infrared cameras and plasticine eggs were used to identify potential nest predators of Flightless Steamer-Ducks (Tachyeres pteneres) and Flying Steamer-Ducks (T. patachonicus) and to evaluate the relative efficacy of these methods for identifying predators. Cameras were set up at 31 artificial nests with plasticine eggs and at four Flightless and two Flying steamer-duck nests. Two avian predators, Chimango Caracara (Milvago chimango) and Southern Crested Caracara (Caracara plancus), and two mammalian predators, Fuegian Culpeo fox (Pseudalopex culpaeus lycoides) and American mink (Neovison vison), were identified as depredating artificial nests from photos. Active Flightless and Flying steamer-duck nests were found only on islets, and from the photos the Chimango and Southern Crested caracaras were identified as nest predators. Mammalian predators were not photographed on islets (neither on artificial nor natural nests). Though the potential predator community at Lapataia Bay was small, there were considerable similarities in physical evidence and marks left at nests, especially within avian predators. Also, depredated nests were sometimes revisited by other predators and these multi-predator visits sometimes caused changes to the appearance of the depredated nest following departure of the initial predator. The cameras provided an objective method for definitive identification of nest predators.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A combination of infrared cameras and plasticine eggs were used to identify potential nest predators of Flightless Steamer-Ducks (Tachyeres pteneres) and Flying Steamer-Ducks (T. patachonicus) and to evaluate the relative efficacy of these methods for identifying predators. Cameras were set up at 31 artificial nests with plasticine eggs and at four Flightless and two Flying steamer-duck nests. Two avian predators, Chimango Caracara (Milvago chimango) and Southern Crested Caracara (Caracara plancus), and two mammalian predators, Fuegian Culpeo fox (Pseudalopex culpaeus lycoides) and American mink (Neovison vison), were identified as depredating artificial nests from photos. Active Flightless and Flying steamer-duck nests were found only on islets, and from the photos the Chimango and Southern Crested caracaras were identified as nest predators. Mammalian predators were not photographed on islets (neither on artificial nor natural nests). Though the potential predator community at Lapataia Bay was small, there were considerable similarities in physical evidence and marks left at nests, especially within avian predators. Also, depredated nests were sometimes revisited by other predators and these multi-predator visits sometimes caused changes to the appearance of the depredated nest following departure of the initial predator. The cameras provided an objective method for definitive identification of nest predators.

Key concepts: Predation, Nest (protein structural motif), Predator, Plasticine, Biology, Nest box, Ecology, Zoology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Nest Predators of Flightless Steamer-Ducks ( Tachyeres pteneres ) and Flying Steamer-Ducks ( Tachyeres patachonicus ) — Research Paper | ScholarLens