2009Journal of Clinical Pediatric DentistryOpen access

Parents' Attitude toward their Children's Appearance in the Case of Esthetic Defects of the Anterior Primary Teeth

Gideon Holan, Munaya Abu Rahme, Diana Ram

Open full text 29 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate parents' attitude toward esthetic defects of maxillary primary incisors and the association between various demographic parameters and the treatment parents chose for their children. METHODS: The study consisted of two parts: 1) a clinical examination of the child's primary incisors, and 2) a questionnaire for the accompanying parent. 362 parents who accompanied 294 children aged 1-6 years, participated in the study. They were divided in 2 groups: parents' accompanying children with esthetic defects (study group) and parents' of children without esthetic defects (control group). RESULTS: Significantly more parents in the study group (73%) recognized an esthetic problem in their child's incisors, compared to (17%) in the control group. Eighty seven percent (219 in the Study Group [85.20%] and 97 in the Control Group [92.4%]) advocated dental treatment to save a primary tooth even if the chances for success were only 50%. 35.9% rejected the idea of a prosthetic replacement for a lost primary incisor. The same percentage of parents (35.9%) answered that they "want it 'very much'" while the rest (28.2%) chose intermediate scores '2-3' on a scale of '0' (= not at all) to '5' (= yes! very much). CONCLUSION: Parents are interested in a conservative treatment for preserving esthetically damaged incisors, but will be less enthusiastic to replace extracted or missing teeth with an esthetic device.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: To evaluate parents' attitude toward esthetic defects of maxillary primary incisors and the association between various demographic parameters and the treatment parents chose for their children. METHODS: The study consisted of two parts: 1) a clinical examination of the child's primary incisors, and 2) a questionnaire for the accompanying parent. 362 parents who accompanied 294 children aged 1-6 years, participated in the study. They were divided in 2 groups: parents' accompanying children with esthetic defects (study group) and parents' of children without esthetic defects (control group). RESULTS: Significantly more parents in the study group (73%) recognized an esthetic problem in their child's incisors, compared to (17%) in the control group. Eighty seven percent (219 in the Study Group [85.20%] and 97 in the Control Group [92.4%]) advocated dental treatment to save a primary tooth even if the chances for success were only 50%. 35.9% rejected the idea of a prosthetic replacement for a lost primary incisor. The same percentage of parents (35.9%) answered that they "want it 'very much'" while the rest (28.2%) chose intermediate scores '2-3' on a scale of '0' (= not at all) to '5' (= yes! very much). CONCLUSION: Parents are interested in a conservative treatment for preserving esthetically damaged incisors, but will be less enthusiastic to replace extracted or missing teeth with an esthetic device.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 29 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate parents' attitude toward esthetic defects of maxillary primary incisors and the association between various demographic parameters and the treatment parents chose for their children. METHODS: The study consisted of two parts: 1) a clinical examination of the child's primary incisors, and 2) a questionnaire for the accompanying parent. 362 parents who accompanied 294 children aged 1-6 years, participated in the study. They were divided in 2 groups: parents' accompanying children with esthetic defects (study group) and parents' of children without esthetic defects (control group). RESULTS: Significantly more parents in the study group (73%) recognized an esthetic problem in their child's incisors, compared to (17%) in the control group. Eighty seven percent (219 in the Study Group [85.20%] and 97 in the Control Group [92.4%]) advocated dental treatment to save a primary tooth even if the chances for success were only 50%. 35.9% rejected the idea of a prosthetic replacement for a lost primary incisor. The same percentage of parents (35.9%) answered that they "want it 'very much'" while the rest (28.2%) chose intermediate scores '2-3' on a scale of '0' (= not at all) to '5' (= yes! very much). CONCLUSION: Parents are interested in a conservative treatment for preserving esthetically damaged incisors, but will be less enthusiastic to replace extracted or missing teeth with an esthetic device.

Key concepts: Anterior teeth, Medicine, Incisor, Dentistry, Orthodontics, Tooth discoloration, Maxillary central incisor

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Parents' Attitude toward their Children's Appearance in the Case of Esthetic Defects of the Anterior Primary Teeth — Research Paper | ScholarLens