1996•Journal Of Clinical PeriodontologyRequires access

An investigation of the validity of attachment level measurements with an automated periodontal probe

Naseer Ahmed, Trevor L. P. Watts, Ronald F. Wilson

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

There is a need for information on the validity of probing depth and attachment level measurements made with automated probes. In this study, 34 teeth in 9 patients were measured with the Florida probe from points marked with a bur prior to extraction. After extraction, connective tissue attachment levels were measured from the same points with a dissecting microscope. Mean measurements of attachment level were similar with probing (5.13 +/- 2.08 mm) and laboratory (5.18 +/- 2.26 mm) assessments. The correlation between these measurements was 0.72 (p < 0.001), and a t-test of the paired measurements showed no difference (t = 0.44; p = 0.66). The Florida probe thus showed satisfactory validity for this group of measurements of advanced periodontitis. However, there was substantial lack of agreement between individual probing measurements and the validity criterion of laboratory attachment level measurements, and the intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.46. It was concluded that the Florida probe was suitable for studies in which measurements were averaged, but not for longitudinal study of individual sites.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There is a need for information on the validity of probing depth and attachment level measurements made with automated probes. In this study, 34 teeth in 9 patients were measured with the Florida probe from points marked with a bur prior to extraction. After extraction, connective tissue attachment levels were measured from the same points with a dissecting microscope. Mean measurements of attachment level were similar with probing (5.13 +/- 2.08 mm) and laboratory (5.18 +/- 2.26 mm) assessments. The correlation between these measurements was 0.72 (p < 0.001), and a t-test of the paired measurements showed no difference (t = 0.44; p = 0.66). The Florida probe thus showed satisfactory validity for this group of measurements of advanced periodontitis. However, there was substantial lack of agreement between individual probing measurements and the validity criterion of laboratory attachment level measurements, and the intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.46. It was concluded that the Florida probe was suitable for studies in which measurements were averaged, but not for longitudinal study of individual sites.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There is a need for information on the validity of probing depth and attachment level measurements made with automated probes. In this study, 34 teeth in 9 patients were measured with the Florida probe from points marked with a bur prior to extraction. After extraction, connective tissue attachment levels were measured from the same points with a dissecting microscope. Mean measurements of attachment level were similar with probing (5.13 +/- 2.08 mm) and laboratory (5.18 +/- 2.26 mm) assessments. The correlation between these measurements was 0.72 (p < 0.001), and a t-test of the paired measurements showed no difference (t = 0.44; p = 0.66). The Florida probe thus showed satisfactory validity for this group of measurements of advanced periodontitis. However, there was substantial lack of agreement between individual probing measurements and the validity criterion of laboratory attachment level measurements, and the intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.46. It was concluded that the Florida probe was suitable for studies in which measurements were averaged, but not for longitudinal study of individual sites.

Key concepts: Dentistry, Periodontal probe, Correlation coefficient, Periodontitis, Connective tissue, Correlation, Clinical attachment loss, Gingival and periodontal pocket

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An investigation of the validity of attachment level measurements with an automated periodontal probe — Research Paper | ScholarLens