2008•Industrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchOpen access

Reducing the Cost of CO2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Membrane Technology

Minh T. Ho, Guy W. Allinson, Dianne E. Wiley

Open full text 257 citations

Abstract

Studies of CO 2 capture using membrane technology from coal-fired power-plant flue gas typically assume compression of the feed to achieve a driving force across the membrane. The high CO 2 capture cost of these systems reflects the need to compress the low-pressure feed gas (1 bar) and the low CO 2 purity of the product stream. This article investigates how costs for CO 2 capture using membranes can be reduced by operating under vacuum conditions. The flue gas is pressurized to 1.5 bar, whereas the permeate stream is at 0.08 bar. Under these operating conditions, the capture cost is U.S. $54/tonne CO 2 avoided compared to U.S. $82/tonne CO 2 avoided using membrane processes with a pressurized feed. This is a reduction of 35%. The article also investigates the effect on the capture cost of improvements in CO 2 permeability and selectivity. The results show that the capture cost can be reduced to less than U.S. $25/tonne CO 2 avoided when the CO 2 permeability is 300 barrer, CO 2 /N 2 selectivity is 250, and the membrane cost is U.S. $10/m 2 .

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Studies of CO 2 capture using membrane technology from coal-fired power-plant flue gas typically assume compression of the feed to achieve a driving force across the membrane. The high CO 2 capture cost of these systems reflects the need to compress the low-pressure feed gas (1 bar) and the low CO 2 purity of the product stream. This article investigates how costs for CO 2 capture using membranes can be reduced by operating under vacuum conditions. The flue gas is pressurized to 1.5 bar, whereas the permeate stream is at 0.08 bar. Under these operating conditions, the capture cost is U.S. $54/tonne CO 2 avoided compared to U.S. $82/tonne CO 2 avoided using membrane processes with a pressurized feed. This is a reduction of 35%. The article also investigates the effect on the capture cost of improvements in CO 2 permeability and selectivity. The results show that the capture cost can be reduced to less than U.S. $25/tonne CO 2 avoided when the CO 2 permeability is 300 barrer, CO 2 /N 2 selectivity is 250, and the membrane cost is U.S. $10/m 2 .

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 257 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Studies of CO 2 capture using membrane technology from coal-fired power-plant flue gas typically assume compression of the feed to achieve a driving force across the membrane. The high CO 2 capture cost of these systems reflects the need to compress the low-pressure feed gas (1 bar) and the low CO 2 purity of the product stream. This article investigates how costs for CO 2 capture using membranes can be reduced by operating under vacuum conditions. The flue gas is pressurized to 1.5 bar, whereas the permeate stream is at 0.08 bar. Under these operating conditions, the capture cost is U.S. $54/tonne CO 2 avoided compared to U.S. $82/tonne CO 2 avoided using membrane processes with a pressurized feed. This is a reduction of 35%. The article also investigates the effect on the capture cost of improvements in CO 2 permeability and selectivity. The results show that the capture cost can be reduced to less than U.S. $25/tonne CO 2 avoided when the CO 2 permeability is 300 barrer, CO 2 /N 2 selectivity is 250, and the membrane cost is U.S. $10/m 2 .

Key concepts: Flue gas, Barrer, Tonne, Membrane, Membrane technology, Process engineering, Waste management, Bar (unit)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reducing the Cost of CO2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Membrane Technology — Research Paper | ScholarLens