2005•Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIEOpen access

Scintillation: theory vs. experiment

Frida Strömqvist Vetelino, Cynthia Young, Larry C. Andrews, Kenneth J. Grant, Kerry A. Corbett, Bradley A. Clare

Open full text 21 citations

Abstract

In May 2004 a joint atmospheric propagation experiment was conducted between the Australian Defence Science and Technology Organisation, the Office of Naval Research and the University of Central Florida. A 45 mm divergent Gaussian beam was propagated along a horizontal 1500 meter path approximately 2 meters above the ground. At the receiver were 3 apertures of diameter 1mm, 5mm, and 13mm. The scintillation was measured at each aperture and compared to scintillation theory, recently developed for all regimes of optical turbulence. Three atmospheric parameters, Cn2, lo and Lo, were inferred from these optical measurements. Simultaneously, a commercial scintillometer, which recorded values for Cn2, was set up parallel to the optical path. In this paper, a numerical scheme is used to infer the three atmospheric parameters and comparisons are made with the Cn2 readings from the scintillometer.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In May 2004 a joint atmospheric propagation experiment was conducted between the Australian Defence Science and Technology Organisation, the Office of Naval Research and the University of Central Florida. A 45 mm divergent Gaussian beam was propagated along a horizontal 1500 meter path approximately 2 meters above the ground. At the receiver were 3 apertures of diameter 1mm, 5mm, and 13mm. The scintillation was measured at each aperture and compared to scintillation theory, recently developed for all regimes of optical turbulence. Three atmospheric parameters, Cn2, lo and Lo, were inferred from these optical measurements. Simultaneously, a commercial scintillometer, which recorded values for Cn2, was set up parallel to the optical path. In this paper, a numerical scheme is used to infer the three atmospheric parameters and comparisons are made with the Cn2 readings from the scintillometer.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In May 2004 a joint atmospheric propagation experiment was conducted between the Australian Defence Science and Technology Organisation, the Office of Naval Research and the University of Central Florida. A 45 mm divergent Gaussian beam was propagated along a horizontal 1500 meter path approximately 2 meters above the ground. At the receiver were 3 apertures of diameter 1mm, 5mm, and 13mm. The scintillation was measured at each aperture and compared to scintillation theory, recently developed for all regimes of optical turbulence. Three atmospheric parameters, Cn2, lo and Lo, were inferred from these optical measurements. Simultaneously, a commercial scintillometer, which recorded values for Cn2, was set up parallel to the optical path. In this paper, a numerical scheme is used to infer the three atmospheric parameters and comparisons are made with the Cn2 readings from the scintillometer.

Key concepts: Scintillometer, Scintillation, Atmospheric turbulence, Physics, Optics, Turbulence, Remote sensing, Meteorology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Scintillation: theory vs. experiment — Research Paper | ScholarLens