2013Unpublished venueRequires access

Implementing an online undergraduate course in educational writing

David W. Price, Saul Carliner, Patrick Devey, Nidia Cerna

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This case describes the implementation of an online undergraduate course in educational writing, and reviews literature on undergraduate composition; e-learning and dropout risks; and online writing instruction including programs at Texas Tech University, the University of Minnesota, and the University of Texas at El Paso. This case relies on interviews with the professor, instructional designer, chief learning officer, and teaching assistant. Prompted by the university e-learning provider, a professor and instructional designer created an 8-lesson online writing course called Educational Communication using videos, PDFs and online exercises, reading comprehension and graded writing assignments, and an in-person final exam. The designer enforced deadlines, and helped structure and simplify content, and the professor pushed for new techniques and interaction. Developed in 2008, the course was completed while students were enrolled, and served 483 students over nine semesters. Enrolments are lower (and dropouts higher) than other university e-learning due to a heavier workload. The initial teaching assistant experienced demands for reassurance, a need to norm grading, and plagiarism. The professor enjoyed meeting students by email, online chats, and at the final exam but felt distanced when asked for recommendations. The course has yet to recover development costs. The professor wishes to revise the course to focus on education.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This case describes the implementation of an online undergraduate course in educational writing, and reviews literature on undergraduate composition; e-learning and dropout risks; and online writing instruction including programs at Texas Tech University, the University of Minnesota, and the University of Texas at El Paso. This case relies on interviews with the professor, instructional designer, chief learning officer, and teaching assistant. Prompted by the university e-learning provider, a professor and instructional designer created an 8-lesson online writing course called Educational Communication using videos, PDFs and online exercises, reading comprehension and graded writing assignments, and an in-person final exam. The designer enforced deadlines, and helped structure and simplify content, and the professor pushed for new techniques and interaction. Developed in 2008, the course was completed while students were enrolled, and served 483 students over nine semesters. Enrolments are lower (and dropouts higher) than other university e-learning due to a heavier workload. The initial teaching assistant experienced demands for reassurance, a need to norm grading, and plagiarism. The professor enjoyed meeting students by email, online chats, and at the final exam but felt distanced when asked for recommendations. The course has yet to recover development costs. The professor wishes to revise the course to focus on education.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This case describes the implementation of an online undergraduate course in educational writing, and reviews literature on undergraduate composition; e-learning and dropout risks; and online writing instruction including programs at Texas Tech University, the University of Minnesota, and the University of Texas at El Paso. This case relies on interviews with the professor, instructional designer, chief learning officer, and teaching assistant. Prompted by the university e-learning provider, a professor and instructional designer created an 8-lesson online writing course called Educational Communication using videos, PDFs and online exercises, reading comprehension and graded writing assignments, and an in-person final exam. The designer enforced deadlines, and helped structure and simplify content, and the professor pushed for new techniques and interaction. Developed in 2008, the course was completed while students were enrolled, and served 483 students over nine semesters. Enrolments are lower (and dropouts higher) than other university e-learning due to a heavier workload. The initial teaching assistant experienced demands for reassurance, a need to norm grading, and plagiarism. The professor enjoyed meeting students by email, online chats, and at the final exam but felt distanced when asked for recommendations. The course has yet to recover development costs. The professor wishes to revise the course to focus on education.

Key concepts: Grading (engineering), Workload, Computer science, Mathematics education, Instructional design, Online course, Online learning, Medical education

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Implementing an online undergraduate course in educational writing — Research Paper | ScholarLens