1986•Electronics and Communications in Japan (Part I Communications)Requires access

Responses of radio interference measuring apparatus employing an envelope quasi‐peak detector

Akira Sugiura, Tetsuo Oguchi, Hirojiro Nagatomo

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Abstract In conventional radio interference measuring apparatus, the direct‐QP detection method is used. In this method, intermediate frequency output is added directly to a quasi‐peak detector to obtain an output corresponding to the quasi‐peak level of the interference. However, a new type of QP detection method has recently been used in the radio interference measuring apparatus as demonstrated in the spectrum analyzer with the quasi‐peak detection capability. In this method, the intermediate frequency output is first added to an envelope detector and then to quasi‐peak detector. But it is not yet known if this measuring apparatus with its combination of detector, the envelope‐QP detector, satisfies all standards, including present CISPR specifications. The latter is determined based on the response characteristics of the direct‐QP detector system. In this paper, theoretical computer comparison has been made between the direct‐QP detector system and the envelope‐QP detector system to study responses to Gaussian noise and the repeated pulse input. It is found that the measuring apparatus with an envelope QP detector does not easily satisfy the present CISPR specifications. To improve the response characteristics of this new apparatus having the envelope‐QP detector, guidelines, have been indicated for the bandwidth and the charge and discharge time constants.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract In conventional radio interference measuring apparatus, the direct‐QP detection method is used. In this method, intermediate frequency output is added directly to a quasi‐peak detector to obtain an output corresponding to the quasi‐peak level of the interference. However, a new type of QP detection method has recently been used in the radio interference measuring apparatus as demonstrated in the spectrum analyzer with the quasi‐peak detection capability. In this method, the intermediate frequency output is first added to an envelope detector and then to quasi‐peak detector. But it is not yet known if this measuring apparatus with its combination of detector, the envelope‐QP detector, satisfies all standards, including present CISPR specifications. The latter is determined based on the response characteristics of the direct‐QP detector system. In this paper, theoretical computer comparison has been made between the direct‐QP detector system and the envelope‐QP detector system to study responses to Gaussian noise and the repeated pulse input. It is found that the measuring apparatus with an envelope QP detector does not easily satisfy the present CISPR specifications. To improve the response characteristics of this new apparatus having the envelope‐QP detector, guidelines, have been indicated for the bandwidth and the charge and discharge time constants.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract In conventional radio interference measuring apparatus, the direct‐QP detection method is used. In this method, intermediate frequency output is added directly to a quasi‐peak detector to obtain an output corresponding to the quasi‐peak level of the interference. However, a new type of QP detection method has recently been used in the radio interference measuring apparatus as demonstrated in the spectrum analyzer with the quasi‐peak detection capability. In this method, the intermediate frequency output is first added to an envelope detector and then to quasi‐peak detector. But it is not yet known if this measuring apparatus with its combination of detector, the envelope‐QP detector, satisfies all standards, including present CISPR specifications. The latter is determined based on the response characteristics of the direct‐QP detector system. In this paper, theoretical computer comparison has been made between the direct‐QP detector system and the envelope‐QP detector system to study responses to Gaussian noise and the repeated pulse input. It is found that the measuring apparatus with an envelope QP detector does not easily satisfy the present CISPR specifications. To improve the response characteristics of this new apparatus having the envelope‐QP detector, guidelines, have been indicated for the bandwidth and the charge and discharge time constants.

Key concepts: Detector, Envelope detector, Interference (communication), Phase detector characteristic, Envelope (radar), Physics, Electronic engineering, Acoustics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Responses of radio interference measuring apparatus employing an envelope quasi‐peak detector — Research Paper | ScholarLens