Responses of radio interference measuring apparatus employing an envelope quasi‐peak detector
Akira Sugiura, Tetsuo Oguchi, Hirojiro Nagatomo
Abstract
Akira Sugiura, Tetsuo Oguchi, Hirojiro Nagatomo
Abstract
Abstract In conventional radio interference measuring apparatus, the direct‐QP detection method is used. In this method, intermediate frequency output is added directly to a quasi‐peak detector to obtain an output corresponding to the quasi‐peak level of the interference. However, a new type of QP detection method has recently been used in the radio interference measuring apparatus as demonstrated in the spectrum analyzer with the quasi‐peak detection capability. In this method, the intermediate frequency output is first added to an envelope detector and then to quasi‐peak detector. But it is not yet known if this measuring apparatus with its combination of detector, the envelope‐QP detector, satisfies all standards, including present CISPR specifications. The latter is determined based on the response characteristics of the direct‐QP detector system. In this paper, theoretical computer comparison has been made between the direct‐QP detector system and the envelope‐QP detector system to study responses to Gaussian noise and the repeated pulse input. It is found that the measuring apparatus with an envelope QP detector does not easily satisfy the present CISPR specifications. To improve the response characteristics of this new apparatus having the envelope‐QP detector, guidelines, have been indicated for the bandwidth and the charge and discharge time constants.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract In conventional radio interference measuring apparatus, the direct‐QP detection method is used. In this method, intermediate frequency output is added directly to a quasi‐peak detector to obtain an output corresponding to the quasi‐peak level of the interference. However, a new type of QP detection method has recently been used in the radio interference measuring apparatus as demonstrated in the spectrum analyzer with the quasi‐peak detection capability. In this method, the intermediate frequency output is first added to an envelope detector and then to quasi‐peak detector. But it is not yet known if this measuring apparatus with its combination of detector, the envelope‐QP detector, satisfies all standards, including present CISPR specifications. The latter is determined based on the response characteristics of the direct‐QP detector system. In this paper, theoretical computer comparison has been made between the direct‐QP detector system and the envelope‐QP detector system to study responses to Gaussian noise and the repeated pulse input. It is found that the measuring apparatus with an envelope QP detector does not easily satisfy the present CISPR specifications. To improve the response characteristics of this new apparatus having the envelope‐QP detector, guidelines, have been indicated for the bandwidth and the charge and discharge time constants.
Key concepts: Detector, Envelope detector, Interference (communication), Phase detector characteristic, Envelope (radar), Physics, Electronic engineering, Acoustics