Temperature-Staged Anaerobic Processes
M. Duran, Richard E. Speece
Abstract
M. Duran, Richard E. Speece
Abstract
This study compares the mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic biotreatment processes treating a common substrate in laboratory scale CSTRs in terms of their effluent quality. The improvement in the performance and the effluent quality of these systems by temperature-staged processes, i.e., mesophilic and thermophilic reactors in series, were also investigated. The data presented in this paper showed that thermophilic anaerobic microorganisms had a 26% higher initial substrate utilization rates (SUR0) for COD as compared to the mesophilic ones. Mesophilic bacteria, on the other hand, produced a better quality effluent as indicated by lower effluent soluble COD concentrations. The results also indicated that the poor effluent quality of thermophilic anaerobic processes can be improved by a temperature-staged process configuration with a mesophilic secondary unit. As high as 95% COD removal rates were achieved by the thermophilic-mesophilic staged process at an organic rate of 2 g.l−1.day−1. In a temperature-staged process, the most efficient process was a mesophilic secondary stage. It makes only a slight difference whether the mesophilic secondary unit follows a mesophilic or a thermophilic reactor with respect to effluent quality.
OpenAlex reports 46 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This study compares the mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic biotreatment processes treating a common substrate in laboratory scale CSTRs in terms of their effluent quality. The improvement in the performance and the effluent quality of these systems by temperature-staged processes, i.e., mesophilic and thermophilic reactors in series, were also investigated. The data presented in this paper showed that thermophilic anaerobic microorganisms had a 26% higher initial substrate utilization rates (SUR0) for COD as compared to the mesophilic ones. Mesophilic bacteria, on the other hand, produced a better quality effluent as indicated by lower effluent soluble COD concentrations. The results also indicated that the poor effluent quality of thermophilic anaerobic processes can be improved by a temperature-staged process configuration with a mesophilic secondary unit. As high as 95% COD removal rates were achieved by the thermophilic-mesophilic staged process at an organic rate of 2 g.l−1.day−1. In a temperature-staged process, the most efficient process was a mesophilic secondary stage. It makes only a slight difference whether the mesophilic secondary unit follows a mesophilic or a thermophilic reactor with respect to effluent quality.
Key concepts: Mesophile, Effluent, Thermophile, Pulp and paper industry, Chemistry, Microorganism, Anaerobic exercise, Waste management