1997Environmental TechnologyRequires access

Temperature-Staged Anaerobic Processes

M. Duran, Richard E. Speece

Open publisher page 46 citations

Abstract

This study compares the mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic biotreatment processes treating a common substrate in laboratory scale CSTRs in terms of their effluent quality. The improvement in the performance and the effluent quality of these systems by temperature-staged processes, i.e., mesophilic and thermophilic reactors in series, were also investigated. The data presented in this paper showed that thermophilic anaerobic microorganisms had a 26% higher initial substrate utilization rates (SUR0) for COD as compared to the mesophilic ones. Mesophilic bacteria, on the other hand, produced a better quality effluent as indicated by lower effluent soluble COD concentrations. The results also indicated that the poor effluent quality of thermophilic anaerobic processes can be improved by a temperature-staged process configuration with a mesophilic secondary unit. As high as 95% COD removal rates were achieved by the thermophilic-mesophilic staged process at an organic rate of 2 g.l−1.day−1. In a temperature-staged process, the most efficient process was a mesophilic secondary stage. It makes only a slight difference whether the mesophilic secondary unit follows a mesophilic or a thermophilic reactor with respect to effluent quality.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study compares the mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic biotreatment processes treating a common substrate in laboratory scale CSTRs in terms of their effluent quality. The improvement in the performance and the effluent quality of these systems by temperature-staged processes, i.e., mesophilic and thermophilic reactors in series, were also investigated. The data presented in this paper showed that thermophilic anaerobic microorganisms had a 26% higher initial substrate utilization rates (SUR0) for COD as compared to the mesophilic ones. Mesophilic bacteria, on the other hand, produced a better quality effluent as indicated by lower effluent soluble COD concentrations. The results also indicated that the poor effluent quality of thermophilic anaerobic processes can be improved by a temperature-staged process configuration with a mesophilic secondary unit. As high as 95% COD removal rates were achieved by the thermophilic-mesophilic staged process at an organic rate of 2 g.l−1.day−1. In a temperature-staged process, the most efficient process was a mesophilic secondary stage. It makes only a slight difference whether the mesophilic secondary unit follows a mesophilic or a thermophilic reactor with respect to effluent quality.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 46 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study compares the mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic biotreatment processes treating a common substrate in laboratory scale CSTRs in terms of their effluent quality. The improvement in the performance and the effluent quality of these systems by temperature-staged processes, i.e., mesophilic and thermophilic reactors in series, were also investigated. The data presented in this paper showed that thermophilic anaerobic microorganisms had a 26% higher initial substrate utilization rates (SUR0) for COD as compared to the mesophilic ones. Mesophilic bacteria, on the other hand, produced a better quality effluent as indicated by lower effluent soluble COD concentrations. The results also indicated that the poor effluent quality of thermophilic anaerobic processes can be improved by a temperature-staged process configuration with a mesophilic secondary unit. As high as 95% COD removal rates were achieved by the thermophilic-mesophilic staged process at an organic rate of 2 g.l−1.day−1. In a temperature-staged process, the most efficient process was a mesophilic secondary stage. It makes only a slight difference whether the mesophilic secondary unit follows a mesophilic or a thermophilic reactor with respect to effluent quality.

Key concepts: Mesophile, Effluent, Thermophile, Pulp and paper industry, Chemistry, Microorganism, Anaerobic exercise, Waste management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Temperature-Staged Anaerobic Processes — Research Paper | ScholarLens