1934The Journal of GeologyRequires access

The Carboniferous-Permian Dilemma

Harry E. Wheeler

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

The extreme diversity of opinion as regards the position of the boundary between the Carboniferous and Permian has led to a review of the stratigraphy in the type areas of those systems, together with a survey of some of the more important works on the critical areas of "Upper Carboniferous" and "Lower Permian" marine deposits throughout the world. A graphic comparison of various delimitations shows that the boundary has oscillated throughout the Moscovian, Uralian, and Artinskian stages; that is, in the most prevalent of American terminologies, from the base of the "Pennsylvanian" to well within the "Permian." Confusion would be eliminated, and greater precision in correlating strata and events would be attained by a more extended use of the European stage designations than by continuing to employ terms of such variable and ambiguous sonnotation as "Carboniferous" and "Permian."

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The extreme diversity of opinion as regards the position of the boundary between the Carboniferous and Permian has led to a review of the stratigraphy in the type areas of those systems, together with a survey of some of the more important works on the critical areas of "Upper Carboniferous" and "Lower Permian" marine deposits throughout the world. A graphic comparison of various delimitations shows that the boundary has oscillated throughout the Moscovian, Uralian, and Artinskian stages; that is, in the most prevalent of American terminologies, from the base of the "Pennsylvanian" to well within the "Permian." Confusion would be eliminated, and greater precision in correlating strata and events would be attained by a more extended use of the European stage designations than by continuing to employ terms of such variable and ambiguous sonnotation as "Carboniferous" and "Permian."

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The extreme diversity of opinion as regards the position of the boundary between the Carboniferous and Permian has led to a review of the stratigraphy in the type areas of those systems, together with a survey of some of the more important works on the critical areas of "Upper Carboniferous" and "Lower Permian" marine deposits throughout the world. A graphic comparison of various delimitations shows that the boundary has oscillated throughout the Moscovian, Uralian, and Artinskian stages; that is, in the most prevalent of American terminologies, from the base of the "Pennsylvanian" to well within the "Permian." Confusion would be eliminated, and greater precision in correlating strata and events would be attained by a more extended use of the European stage designations than by continuing to employ terms of such variable and ambiguous sonnotation as "Carboniferous" and "Permian."

Key concepts: Permian, Carboniferous, Geology, Paleontology, Pennsylvanian, Paleozoic, Stage (stratigraphy), Stratotype

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Carboniferous-Permian Dilemma — Research Paper | ScholarLens