2014International Journal of Pavement EngineeringRequires access

Evaluating pavement management treatment selection utilising continuous deflection measurements in flexible pavements

Zhongjie Zhang, Kevin Gaspard, Mostafa A. Elseifi

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

The objective of this study was to develop a new structural index based on rolling wheel deflectometer (RWD) deflection data to describe pavement structural capacity and to improve pavement management treatment selection. To achieve this objective, pavement conditions including surface cracking, rutting, roughness and asphalt layer thicknesses were categorised and sorted according to their AC layer thickness and divided into various subgroups. The cumulative distribution function of the new RWD index in each subgroup was generated so that various percentiles were calculated and used to define the boundary between structural and functional rehabilitation. Results showed that the Louisiana criteria may recommend structural rehabilitation for pavements with sound pavement structure (Type I error) and functional rehabilitation to pavements with weak pavement structure (Type II error). Therefore, the state pavement management system should consider both pavement structural indices and surface distress indices currently available when making recommendations for pavement preservation and rehabilitation. RWD testing technology and indices derived from its data are one of the most promising candidates to fulfil this need.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The objective of this study was to develop a new structural index based on rolling wheel deflectometer (RWD) deflection data to describe pavement structural capacity and to improve pavement management treatment selection. To achieve this objective, pavement conditions including surface cracking, rutting, roughness and asphalt layer thicknesses were categorised and sorted according to their AC layer thickness and divided into various subgroups. The cumulative distribution function of the new RWD index in each subgroup was generated so that various percentiles were calculated and used to define the boundary between structural and functional rehabilitation. Results showed that the Louisiana criteria may recommend structural rehabilitation for pavements with sound pavement structure (Type I error) and functional rehabilitation to pavements with weak pavement structure (Type II error). Therefore, the state pavement management system should consider both pavement structural indices and surface distress indices currently available when making recommendations for pavement preservation and rehabilitation. RWD testing technology and indices derived from its data are one of the most promising candidates to fulfil this need.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The objective of this study was to develop a new structural index based on rolling wheel deflectometer (RWD) deflection data to describe pavement structural capacity and to improve pavement management treatment selection. To achieve this objective, pavement conditions including surface cracking, rutting, roughness and asphalt layer thicknesses were categorised and sorted according to their AC layer thickness and divided into various subgroups. The cumulative distribution function of the new RWD index in each subgroup was generated so that various percentiles were calculated and used to define the boundary between structural and functional rehabilitation. Results showed that the Louisiana criteria may recommend structural rehabilitation for pavements with sound pavement structure (Type I error) and functional rehabilitation to pavements with weak pavement structure (Type II error). Therefore, the state pavement management system should consider both pavement structural indices and surface distress indices currently available when making recommendations for pavement preservation and rehabilitation. RWD testing technology and indices derived from its data are one of the most promising candidates to fulfil this need.

Key concepts: Pavement management, Pavement engineering, Rut, International Roughness Index, Deflection (physics), Asphalt pavement, Cracking, Asphalt

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluating pavement management treatment selection utilising continuous deflection measurements in flexible pavements — Research Paper | ScholarLens