Prophecies of power: Motivational implications of social power for behavioral confirmation.
John T. Copeland
Abstract
John T. Copeland
Abstract
The effects of relative social power on social motivation and behavioral confirmation were assessed. Participants, randomly assigned to the roles of perceiver and target, conversed over an intercom system as a prelude to choosing partners for an ostensibly subsequent reward-laden game. Relative power was manipulated by giving 1 participant the power to choose a partner for the game. Also, perceivers received a game-related target expectation. Participants' motives and trait-based impression of their partners were assessed. High-power participants were more concerned with learning about their partners than low-power participants, who were generally more concerned with facilitating favorable interaction outcomes. Furthermore, whereas high-power perceivers effected behavioral confirmation from their targets, low-power perceivers did not
OpenAlex reports 164 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The effects of relative social power on social motivation and behavioral confirmation were assessed. Participants, randomly assigned to the roles of perceiver and target, conversed over an intercom system as a prelude to choosing partners for an ostensibly subsequent reward-laden game. Relative power was manipulated by giving 1 participant the power to choose a partner for the game. Also, perceivers received a game-related target expectation. Participants' motives and trait-based impression of their partners were assessed. High-power participants were more concerned with learning about their partners than low-power participants, who were generally more concerned with facilitating favorable interaction outcomes. Furthermore, whereas high-power perceivers effected behavioral confirmation from their targets, low-power perceivers did not
Key concepts: Psychology, Power (physics), Social psychology, Social power, Politics, Quantum mechanics, Political science, Law