1996Environmental TechnologyRequires access

Comparison between Three Secondary Effluents in Tertiary High Rate Filtration

Blanca Elena Jiménez, Germán Buitrón

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

The study of filtration of three secondary effluents (activated sludge, rotating biological contactor, and trickling filter) is presented. It was found that filter effluent does not exceed, in average, 3 NTU for all the conditions studied. Activated sludge effluent has longer runs (6 to 27 h) than trickling filter (4 to 9 h) and rotating biological contactor (1 to 5.5 h). Best removals were achieved when treating trickling filter effluent (64%) compared to rotating biological contactor (51%) and activated sludge (55%). In all cases, the end of the run was caused by head loss rather than turbidity. Results showed that the behavior of each effluent varies widely under the same filtration and backwashing conditions and support the need for more experimental work to be conducted.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The study of filtration of three secondary effluents (activated sludge, rotating biological contactor, and trickling filter) is presented. It was found that filter effluent does not exceed, in average, 3 NTU for all the conditions studied. Activated sludge effluent has longer runs (6 to 27 h) than trickling filter (4 to 9 h) and rotating biological contactor (1 to 5.5 h). Best removals were achieved when treating trickling filter effluent (64%) compared to rotating biological contactor (51%) and activated sludge (55%). In all cases, the end of the run was caused by head loss rather than turbidity. Results showed that the behavior of each effluent varies widely under the same filtration and backwashing conditions and support the need for more experimental work to be conducted.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The study of filtration of three secondary effluents (activated sludge, rotating biological contactor, and trickling filter) is presented. It was found that filter effluent does not exceed, in average, 3 NTU for all the conditions studied. Activated sludge effluent has longer runs (6 to 27 h) than trickling filter (4 to 9 h) and rotating biological contactor (1 to 5.5 h). Best removals were achieved when treating trickling filter effluent (64%) compared to rotating biological contactor (51%) and activated sludge (55%). In all cases, the end of the run was caused by head loss rather than turbidity. Results showed that the behavior of each effluent varies widely under the same filtration and backwashing conditions and support the need for more experimental work to be conducted.

Key concepts: Trickling filter, Effluent, Backwashing, Rotating biological contactor, Filtration (mathematics), Activated sludge, Turbidity, Filter (signal processing)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison between Three Secondary Effluents in Tertiary High Rate Filtration — Research Paper | ScholarLens