1987The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

The relationship between vowel variation and vowel-to-vowel coarticulation across languages

Brian McAdams

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The amount of coarticulatory vowel variation within a language may be dependent on the size and distribution of the vowel inventory within the vowel formant space [P. A. Keating and M. K. Huffman, Phonetica 41, 191–207 (1984)]. Similarly, it has been suggested that the extent of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in a language varies in proportion to the degree of vowel variation within the language [S. Y. Manuel and R. A. Krakow, Haskins Status Report No. 77/78, 69–78 (1984)]. Manuel and Krakow supported this idea with evidence comparing Swahili and Shona (5-vowel systems) to English (12-vowel system). The present study compares vowel-to-vowel anticipatory and carryover coarticulation in Japanese and Hausa (10-vowel systems, with different vowel distributions) to German (14-vowel system). Three speakers of each language read bVbV “words” in lists and in frame sentences. The effects of phonemic vowel length and phrasal context on coarticulatory vowel distribution are also considered.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The amount of coarticulatory vowel variation within a language may be dependent on the size and distribution of the vowel inventory within the vowel formant space [P. A. Keating and M. K. Huffman, Phonetica 41, 191–207 (1984)]. Similarly, it has been suggested that the extent of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in a language varies in proportion to the degree of vowel variation within the language [S. Y. Manuel and R. A. Krakow, Haskins Status Report No. 77/78, 69–78 (1984)]. Manuel and Krakow supported this idea with evidence comparing Swahili and Shona (5-vowel systems) to English (12-vowel system). The present study compares vowel-to-vowel anticipatory and carryover coarticulation in Japanese and Hausa (10-vowel systems, with different vowel distributions) to German (14-vowel system). Three speakers of each language read bVbV “words” in lists and in frame sentences. The effects of phonemic vowel length and phrasal context on coarticulatory vowel distribution are also considered.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The amount of coarticulatory vowel variation within a language may be dependent on the size and distribution of the vowel inventory within the vowel formant space [P. A. Keating and M. K. Huffman, Phonetica 41, 191–207 (1984)]. Similarly, it has been suggested that the extent of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in a language varies in proportion to the degree of vowel variation within the language [S. Y. Manuel and R. A. Krakow, Haskins Status Report No. 77/78, 69–78 (1984)]. Manuel and Krakow supported this idea with evidence comparing Swahili and Shona (5-vowel systems) to English (12-vowel system). The present study compares vowel-to-vowel anticipatory and carryover coarticulation in Japanese and Hausa (10-vowel systems, with different vowel distributions) to German (14-vowel system). Three speakers of each language read bVbV “words” in lists and in frame sentences. The effects of phonemic vowel length and phrasal context on coarticulatory vowel distribution are also considered.

Key concepts: Vowel, Coarticulation, Mid vowel, Relative articulation, Linguistics, Mathematics, Variation (astronomy), Vowel length

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The relationship between vowel variation and vowel-to-vowel coarticulation across languages — Research Paper | ScholarLens