1999Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fieldsOpen access

Black-hole polarization and cosmic censorship

Shahar Hod

Open full text 19 citations

Abstract

The destruction of the black-hole event horizon is ruled out by both cosmic censorship and the generalized second law of thermodynamics. We test the consistency of this prediction in a (more) ``dangerous'' version of the gedanken experiment suggested by Bekenstein and Rosenzweig. A $U(1)$-charged particle is lowered slowly into a near extremal black hole which is not endowed with a $U(1)$ gauge field. The energy delivered to the black hole can be redshifted by letting the assimilation point approach the black-hole horizon. At first sight, therefore, the particle is not hindered from entering the black hole and removing its horizon. However, we show that this dangerous situation is excluded by a combination of two factors not considered in former gedanken experiments: the effect of the spacetime curvature on the electrostatic self-interaction of the charged system (the black-hole polarization), and the finite size of the charged body.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The destruction of the black-hole event horizon is ruled out by both cosmic censorship and the generalized second law of thermodynamics. We test the consistency of this prediction in a (more) ``dangerous'' version of the gedanken experiment suggested by Bekenstein and Rosenzweig. A $U(1)$-charged particle is lowered slowly into a near extremal black hole which is not endowed with a $U(1)$ gauge field. The energy delivered to the black hole can be redshifted by letting the assimilation point approach the black-hole horizon. At first sight, therefore, the particle is not hindered from entering the black hole and removing its horizon. However, we show that this dangerous situation is excluded by a combination of two factors not considered in former gedanken experiments: the effect of the spacetime curvature on the electrostatic self-interaction of the charged system (the black-hole polarization), and the finite size of the charged body.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The destruction of the black-hole event horizon is ruled out by both cosmic censorship and the generalized second law of thermodynamics. We test the consistency of this prediction in a (more) ``dangerous'' version of the gedanken experiment suggested by Bekenstein and Rosenzweig. A $U(1)$-charged particle is lowered slowly into a near extremal black hole which is not endowed with a $U(1)$ gauge field. The energy delivered to the black hole can be redshifted by letting the assimilation point approach the black-hole horizon. At first sight, therefore, the particle is not hindered from entering the black hole and removing its horizon. However, we show that this dangerous situation is excluded by a combination of two factors not considered in former gedanken experiments: the effect of the spacetime curvature on the electrostatic self-interaction of the charged system (the black-hole polarization), and the finite size of the charged body.

Key concepts: Cosmic censorship hypothesis, Event horizon, Physics, Charged black hole, Black hole (networking), Extremal black hole, White hole, Nonsingular black hole models

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Black-hole polarization and cosmic censorship — Research Paper | ScholarLens