2002Clinical OtolaryngologyRequires access

Audit of stapedectomy results in a district general hospital

Abhirup Banerjee, Maurice R. Hawthorne, L M Flood, Florita Martin

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

We report a series of 100 stapes operations performed for otosclerosis. The problems in reporting the results of stapedectomies are discussed. The audit showed a difference in the measured results between two consultants. As a result, the consultant with the worse outcome chose to stop operating on patients with otosclerosis. The advantages and disadvantages of a single surgeon performing all the cases are discussed. We advocate a central registry of all surgeons performing stapes surgery to allow periodic national comparative audits.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We report a series of 100 stapes operations performed for otosclerosis. The problems in reporting the results of stapedectomies are discussed. The audit showed a difference in the measured results between two consultants. As a result, the consultant with the worse outcome chose to stop operating on patients with otosclerosis. The advantages and disadvantages of a single surgeon performing all the cases are discussed. We advocate a central registry of all surgeons performing stapes surgery to allow periodic national comparative audits.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We report a series of 100 stapes operations performed for otosclerosis. The problems in reporting the results of stapedectomies are discussed. The audit showed a difference in the measured results between two consultants. As a result, the consultant with the worse outcome chose to stop operating on patients with otosclerosis. The advantages and disadvantages of a single surgeon performing all the cases are discussed. We advocate a central registry of all surgeons performing stapes surgery to allow periodic national comparative audits.

Key concepts: Stapedectomy, Otosclerosis, Stapes surgery, Audit, Stapes, Medicine, General surgery, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Audit of stapedectomy results in a district general hospital — Research Paper | ScholarLens