Audit of stapedectomy results in a district general hospital
Abhirup Banerjee, Maurice R. Hawthorne, L M Flood, Florita Martin
Abstract
Abhirup Banerjee, Maurice R. Hawthorne, L M Flood, Florita Martin
Abstract
We report a series of 100 stapes operations performed for otosclerosis. The problems in reporting the results of stapedectomies are discussed. The audit showed a difference in the measured results between two consultants. As a result, the consultant with the worse outcome chose to stop operating on patients with otosclerosis. The advantages and disadvantages of a single surgeon performing all the cases are discussed. We advocate a central registry of all surgeons performing stapes surgery to allow periodic national comparative audits.
OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We report a series of 100 stapes operations performed for otosclerosis. The problems in reporting the results of stapedectomies are discussed. The audit showed a difference in the measured results between two consultants. As a result, the consultant with the worse outcome chose to stop operating on patients with otosclerosis. The advantages and disadvantages of a single surgeon performing all the cases are discussed. We advocate a central registry of all surgeons performing stapes surgery to allow periodic national comparative audits.
Key concepts: Stapedectomy, Otosclerosis, Stapes surgery, Audit, Stapes, Medicine, General surgery, Surgery