An Introduction and Comparison of Dung's Argumentation Frameworks
Wei Zhang, Shujuan Ji, Yongquan Liang, Qijia Tian
Abstract
Wei Zhang, Shujuan Ji, Yongquan Liang, Qijia Tian
Abstract
Argumentation is a useful abstract mechanism in artificial intelligence; it has a wide range of applications. P.M. Dung's abstract argumentation framework (AF) and assumption-based argumentation framework (ABF) are the most famous and fundamental argumentation frameworks. In this paper, we introduce these two frameworks, compare their differences and identify their relationships. These two frameworks and derivation process can instruct the late comers to construct an argument.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Argumentation is a useful abstract mechanism in artificial intelligence; it has a wide range of applications. P.M. Dung's abstract argumentation framework (AF) and assumption-based argumentation framework (ABF) are the most famous and fundamental argumentation frameworks. In this paper, we introduce these two frameworks, compare their differences and identify their relationships. These two frameworks and derivation process can instruct the late comers to construct an argument.
Key concepts: Argumentation theory, Argumentation framework, Argument (complex analysis), Computer science, Construct (python library), Process (computing), Epistemology, Probabilistic argumentation