2007Skull baseRequires access

Prognostic Factors of Hearing Preservation after Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery

Mislav Gjurić

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objectives: To validate the prognostic capacity of several pre- and intraoperative parameters of hearing preservation after vestibular schwannoma surgery. Study Design: A retrospective study of a consecutive series of 29 patients treated with the enlarged middle cranial fossa approach. Quantitative parameters were tumor volume, linear tumor size, pure-tone and speech audiometry, PTA, SDS, SRT, ABR (IPL I-V, Δ JV), and the caloric test (speed and frequency). Qualitative parameters were fundus involvement by the tumor (in MRI and surgical record), nerve of tumor origin (in MRI and surgical record), ABR parameters (well-shaped ABRs: waves I, III, and V present; presence of wave V). Methods: All patients were divided in two groups on the basis of postoperative hearing: preserved hearing (55%) and nonpreserved hearing (45%). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to evaluate normality of distribution for continuous data. The t-test was applied for normally distributed continuous data, and the Mann-Whitney test for non-normally distributed continuous data. The chi-square test was used for comparisons of categorical data. Results: Tumor volume was found to be the only statistically significant prognostic parameter for hearing preservation (p = 0.007). None of other parameters reached statistical significance. Conclusions: Tumor size is a predictive factor for hearing preservation after vestibular schwannoma surgery, and patients with smaller tumors, based on volume measurement, have significantly better chances for retaining hearing. This has an impact on decision-making and timing of surgery.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objectives: To validate the prognostic capacity of several pre- and intraoperative parameters of hearing preservation after vestibular schwannoma surgery. Study Design: A retrospective study of a consecutive series of 29 patients treated with the enlarged middle cranial fossa approach. Quantitative parameters were tumor volume, linear tumor size, pure-tone and speech audiometry, PTA, SDS, SRT, ABR (IPL I-V, Δ JV), and the caloric test (speed and frequency). Qualitative parameters were fundus involvement by the tumor (in MRI and surgical record), nerve of tumor origin (in MRI and surgical record), ABR parameters (well-shaped ABRs: waves I, III, and V present; presence of wave V). Methods: All patients were divided in two groups on the basis of postoperative hearing: preserved hearing (55%) and nonpreserved hearing (45%). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to evaluate normality of distribution for continuous data. The t-test was applied for normally distributed continuous data, and the Mann-Whitney test for non-normally distributed continuous data. The chi-square test was used for comparisons of categorical data. Results: Tumor volume was found to be the only statistically significant prognostic parameter for hearing preservation (p = 0.007). None of other parameters reached statistical significance. Conclusions: Tumor size is a predictive factor for hearing preservation after vestibular schwannoma surgery, and patients with smaller tumors, based on volume measurement, have significantly better chances for retaining hearing. This has an impact on decision-making and timing of surgery.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objectives: To validate the prognostic capacity of several pre- and intraoperative parameters of hearing preservation after vestibular schwannoma surgery. Study Design: A retrospective study of a consecutive series of 29 patients treated with the enlarged middle cranial fossa approach. Quantitative parameters were tumor volume, linear tumor size, pure-tone and speech audiometry, PTA, SDS, SRT, ABR (IPL I-V, Δ JV), and the caloric test (speed and frequency). Qualitative parameters were fundus involvement by the tumor (in MRI and surgical record), nerve of tumor origin (in MRI and surgical record), ABR parameters (well-shaped ABRs: waves I, III, and V present; presence of wave V). Methods: All patients were divided in two groups on the basis of postoperative hearing: preserved hearing (55%) and nonpreserved hearing (45%). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to evaluate normality of distribution for continuous data. The t-test was applied for normally distributed continuous data, and the Mann-Whitney test for non-normally distributed continuous data. The chi-square test was used for comparisons of categorical data. Results: Tumor volume was found to be the only statistically significant prognostic parameter for hearing preservation (p = 0.007). None of other parameters reached statistical significance. Conclusions: Tumor size is a predictive factor for hearing preservation after vestibular schwannoma surgery, and patients with smaller tumors, based on volume measurement, have significantly better chances for retaining hearing. This has an impact on decision-making and timing of surgery.

Key concepts: Schwannoma, Medicine, Vestibular system, Audiology, Hearing loss, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Prognostic Factors of Hearing Preservation after Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens