1964JAMARequires access

Traditional Gastric Resections in 1963

Claude E. Welch, Stephen E. Hedberg

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

GASTRIC RESECTION has been accepted for nearly three decades as a standard procedure when surgery is indicated for peptic ulcer. Within the past few years, however, the efficacy of vagotomy combined either with resection, gastroenterostomy, or pyloroplasty has been established and the concept of gastric freezing introduced, so that the relative value of the traditional resection without vagotomy is now challenged. This paper will evaluate the present position of gastric resection as the sole operation for various types of peptic ulcer. For the purposes of this discussion, duodenal, gastric, and anastomotic ulcers will be considered. The Billroth I resection will be defined as any resection in which the distal stomach has been removed and the gastric remnant anastomosed to the duodenum; the Billroth II will refer to those distal resections in which the gastric remnant is anastomosed to the jejunum just beyond the ligament of Treitz. The arguments for or

About this research paper

What this paper is about

GASTRIC RESECTION has been accepted for nearly three decades as a standard procedure when surgery is indicated for peptic ulcer. Within the past few years, however, the efficacy of vagotomy combined either with resection, gastroenterostomy, or pyloroplasty has been established and the concept of gastric freezing introduced, so that the relative value of the traditional resection without vagotomy is now challenged. This paper will evaluate the present position of gastric resection as the sole operation for various types of peptic ulcer. For the purposes of this discussion, duodenal, gastric, and anastomotic ulcers will be considered. The Billroth I resection will be defined as any resection in which the distal stomach has been removed and the gastric remnant anastomosed to the duodenum; the Billroth II will refer to those distal resections in which the gastric remnant is anastomosed to the jejunum just beyond the ligament of Treitz. The arguments for or

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

GASTRIC RESECTION has been accepted for nearly three decades as a standard procedure when surgery is indicated for peptic ulcer. Within the past few years, however, the efficacy of vagotomy combined either with resection, gastroenterostomy, or pyloroplasty has been established and the concept of gastric freezing introduced, so that the relative value of the traditional resection without vagotomy is now challenged. This paper will evaluate the present position of gastric resection as the sole operation for various types of peptic ulcer. For the purposes of this discussion, duodenal, gastric, and anastomotic ulcers will be considered. The Billroth I resection will be defined as any resection in which the distal stomach has been removed and the gastric remnant anastomosed to the duodenum; the Billroth II will refer to those distal resections in which the gastric remnant is anastomosed to the jejunum just beyond the ligament of Treitz. The arguments for or

Key concepts: Medicine, Pyloroplasty, Gastroenterostomy, Billroth I, Vagotomy, Anastomosis, Billroth II, Gastrectomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Traditional Gastric Resections in 1963 — Research Paper | ScholarLens