Quantum information in the presence of loss
John Rarity, Bryn A. Bell, Will McCutcheon, A. B. Young, C. Y. Hu
Abstract
John Rarity, Bryn A. Bell, Will McCutcheon, A. B. Young, C. Y. Hu
Abstract
To illustrate the loss problem I take the example of quantum metrology where for interferometric measurement of an optical phase θ, the fundamental limit or the standard quantum limit (SQL) Δθ ≥ 1/√n where n is the number of photons detected. In theory using entangled photons it is possible to beat the SQL and achieve the Heisenberg limit Δθ ≥ 1/n. However this involves detecting the photons in n-fold sets which implies losses will go as Lnwhile in the classical case photons are detected individually and n=1. As a result recent metrology experiments `beating the quantum limit' actually only do so in the artificial case where losses are factored out.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
To illustrate the loss problem I take the example of quantum metrology where for interferometric measurement of an optical phase θ, the fundamental limit or the standard quantum limit (SQL) Δθ ≥ 1/√n where n is the number of photons detected. In theory using entangled photons it is possible to beat the SQL and achieve the Heisenberg limit Δθ ≥ 1/n. However this involves detecting the photons in n-fold sets which implies losses will go as Lnwhile in the classical case photons are detected individually and n=1. As a result recent metrology experiments `beating the quantum limit' actually only do so in the artificial case where losses are factored out.
Key concepts: Heisenberg limit, Photon, Quantum limit, Quantum metrology, Limit (mathematics), Physics, Metrology, Quantum