Reflexivity:promoting rigour in qualitative research
Dev Jootun, Gerry McGhee, Hamilton Campus, Lanarkshire, Glenn Marland
Abstract
Dev Jootun, Gerry McGhee, Hamilton Campus, Lanarkshire, Glenn Marland
Abstract
This article illustrates how the concept of reflexivity has matured inconjunction with developments in qualitative research, and makesthe case for inclusion of a reflexive account to increase the rigourof the research process. A qualitative study (Jootun and McGhee2006) is used to show how the reflexive process improved datareliability. Reflexivity is an invaluable tool to promote understandingof the phenomenon under study and the researcher’s role. Therelationship between, and influence of, the researcher andparticipants should be made explicit.
OpenAlex reports 388 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article illustrates how the concept of reflexivity has matured inconjunction with developments in qualitative research, and makesthe case for inclusion of a reflexive account to increase the rigourof the research process. A qualitative study (Jootun and McGhee2006) is used to show how the reflexive process improved datareliability. Reflexivity is an invaluable tool to promote understandingof the phenomenon under study and the researcher’s role. Therelationship between, and influence of, the researcher andparticipants should be made explicit.
Key concepts: Reflexivity, Rigour, Qualitative research, Epistemology, Process (computing), Phenomenon, Inclusion (mineral), Engineering ethics