2013•Desalination and Water TreatmentOpen access

Magnetic adsorbent used in combination with ultrafiltration membrane for the removal of surfactants from water

Muhammad Zahoor

Open full text 13 citations

Abstract

Powdered activated carbon (PAC)/iron oxide composite (MAC13) was prepared and was characterized by surface area analyzer, powdered X-ray diffraction, and sigma bulk magnetization. The adsorptive parameters of the prepared adsorbent and PAC were determined for Triton X-100, N-dodecylpyridinium chloride, and sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate. The equilibrium adsorption data matched well to Langmuir model in various concentration ranges. The effects on contact time of adsorbates on adsorbents were determined. Both adsorbents were used in hybrid manner in pilot plant with ultrafiltration membrane (UF) system. The UF membrane parameters were determined for both PAC/UF and MAC13/UF process. Although the percent retention for PAC/UF was high, was associated with some secondary problems like cake formation over membrane and blacking of pipes. These secondary problems were not observed for MAC13, as MAC13 was removed from the slurry after use through magnet. Improved permeate fluxes were observed for MAC13 as the decline in permeate flux caused by cake formation was not encountered for magnetic adsorbent. The back wash time for PAC and MAC13 was compared and was found high for PAC.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Powdered activated carbon (PAC)/iron oxide composite (MAC13) was prepared and was characterized by surface area analyzer, powdered X-ray diffraction, and sigma bulk magnetization. The adsorptive parameters of the prepared adsorbent and PAC were determined for Triton X-100, N-dodecylpyridinium chloride, and sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate. The equilibrium adsorption data matched well to Langmuir model in various concentration ranges. The effects on contact time of adsorbates on adsorbents were determined. Both adsorbents were used in hybrid manner in pilot plant with ultrafiltration membrane (UF) system. The UF membrane parameters were determined for both PAC/UF and MAC13/UF process. Although the percent retention for PAC/UF was high, was associated with some secondary problems like cake formation over membrane and blacking of pipes. These secondary problems were not observed for MAC13, as MAC13 was removed from the slurry after use through magnet. Improved permeate fluxes were observed for MAC13 as the decline in permeate flux caused by cake formation was not encountered for magnetic adsorbent. The back wash time for PAC and MAC13 was compared and was found high for PAC.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Powdered activated carbon (PAC)/iron oxide composite (MAC13) was prepared and was characterized by surface area analyzer, powdered X-ray diffraction, and sigma bulk magnetization. The adsorptive parameters of the prepared adsorbent and PAC were determined for Triton X-100, N-dodecylpyridinium chloride, and sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate. The equilibrium adsorption data matched well to Langmuir model in various concentration ranges. The effects on contact time of adsorbates on adsorbents were determined. Both adsorbents were used in hybrid manner in pilot plant with ultrafiltration membrane (UF) system. The UF membrane parameters were determined for both PAC/UF and MAC13/UF process. Although the percent retention for PAC/UF was high, was associated with some secondary problems like cake formation over membrane and blacking of pipes. These secondary problems were not observed for MAC13, as MAC13 was removed from the slurry after use through magnet. Improved permeate fluxes were observed for MAC13 as the decline in permeate flux caused by cake formation was not encountered for magnetic adsorbent. The back wash time for PAC and MAC13 was compared and was found high for PAC.

Key concepts: Ultrafiltration (renal), Adsorption, Membrane, Chromatography, Chemistry, Water treatment, Chemical engineering, Environmental engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Magnetic adsorbent used in combination with ultrafiltration membrane for the removal of surfactants from water — Research Paper | ScholarLens