1949The Journal of GeologyRequires access

A Review of Tectonic Relief in Australia

C. A. Cotton

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Slissmilch and others have maintained for many years that tectonic scarps in eastern Australia, mainly fault scarps, are prominent in New South Wales, and more recently they have described the eastern ranges of Queensland as made up of elongated fault-block features. Alternative explanations recognize a prevalence of multicycle relief forms in New South Wales and attribute the features of the Queensland ranges to subsequent erosion on an ancient structure. In Victoria, South Australia, and parts of Western Australia, large block-faulted relief forms are recognized; but in the first-named state some scarps formerly regarded as tectonic have been more recently relegated to the fault-line scarp category. In Tasmania relief is dominated by fault scarps which are in a sense also structural escarpments; and survival of these in a single cycle from a Lower Miocene tectogenesis is claimed on the strength of paleo-botanical evidence.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Slissmilch and others have maintained for many years that tectonic scarps in eastern Australia, mainly fault scarps, are prominent in New South Wales, and more recently they have described the eastern ranges of Queensland as made up of elongated fault-block features. Alternative explanations recognize a prevalence of multicycle relief forms in New South Wales and attribute the features of the Queensland ranges to subsequent erosion on an ancient structure. In Victoria, South Australia, and parts of Western Australia, large block-faulted relief forms are recognized; but in the first-named state some scarps formerly regarded as tectonic have been more recently relegated to the fault-line scarp category. In Tasmania relief is dominated by fault scarps which are in a sense also structural escarpments; and survival of these in a single cycle from a Lower Miocene tectogenesis is claimed on the strength of paleo-botanical evidence.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Slissmilch and others have maintained for many years that tectonic scarps in eastern Australia, mainly fault scarps, are prominent in New South Wales, and more recently they have described the eastern ranges of Queensland as made up of elongated fault-block features. Alternative explanations recognize a prevalence of multicycle relief forms in New South Wales and attribute the features of the Queensland ranges to subsequent erosion on an ancient structure. In Victoria, South Australia, and parts of Western Australia, large block-faulted relief forms are recognized; but in the first-named state some scarps formerly regarded as tectonic have been more recently relegated to the fault-line scarp category. In Tasmania relief is dominated by fault scarps which are in a sense also structural escarpments; and survival of these in a single cycle from a Lower Miocene tectogenesis is claimed on the strength of paleo-botanical evidence.

Key concepts: Fault scarp, Escarpment, Geology, Tectonics, Fault (geology), Block (permutation group theory), Paleontology, Erosion

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Review of Tectonic Relief in Australia — Research Paper | ScholarLens